Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.03638v1

The paper titled "Provable convergence guarantees for black-box variational inference" addresses the lack of proof regarding the success of stochastic optimization in black-box variational inference. The authors argue that this gap exists due to challenges posed by gradient estimators with unusual noise bounds and a composite non-smooth objective. To address this issue, the authors focus on dense Gaussian variational families and observe that existing gradient estimators based on reparameterization satisfy a quadratic noise bound. They further provide novel convergence guarantees for proximal and projected stochastic gradient descent using this bound. This research breakthrough is significant as it offers the first rigorous guarantee that black-box variational inference can converge for realistic inference problems. By establishing these provable convergence guarantees, the authors bridge a theoretical gap in existing stochastic optimization proofs. This finding has important implications for the field of machine learning, as black-box variational inference is widely used but has lacked formal proof of its effectiveness. The paper is authored by Justin Domke, Guillaume Garrigos, and Robert Gower. It spans 32 pages and falls under the categories of cs.LG (Computer Science - Machine Learning), math.OC (Mathematics - Optimization and Control), and stat.ML (Statistics - Machine Learning).

• - Lack of proof regarding the success of stochastic optimization in black-box variational inference
• - Challenges posed by gradient estimators with unusual noise bounds and a composite non-smooth objective
• - Focus on dense Gaussian variational families and existing gradient estimators based on reparameterization satisfying a quadratic noise bound
• - Novel convergence guarantees for proximal and projected stochastic gradient descent using this bound
• - First rigorous guarantee that black-box variational inference can converge for realistic inference problems
• - Bridging a theoretical gap in existing stochastic optimization proofs
• - Implications for the field of machine learning, as black-box variational inference is widely used but lacked formal proof of its effectiveness
• - Authored by Justin Domke, Guillaume Garrigos, and Robert Gower
• - 32 pages long and falls under the categories of cs.LG, math.OC, and stat.ML

Summary- There is not enough evidence to prove that a certain method called stochastic optimization works well in a type of problem called black-box variational inference. - There are some challenges with the way we estimate gradients (which are like slopes) when there is unusual noise and a special kind of math problem. - People have been focusing on a specific type of math problem and using a certain way to estimate gradients that has a special limit for how much noise it can handle. - Some new guarantees have been found for two types of methods that use this special limit for noise, and these guarantees say that the methods will work well. - This is the first time someone has proven that black-box variational inference can work well in real problems. Definitions- Stochastic optimization: A method used to solve problems where we don't know all the information, but we make guesses and try different things to find an answer. - Black-box variational inference: A type of problem where we want to find the best guess for something, but we don't know all the details about it. - Gradient estimators: A way to figure out how steep or flat something is at different points by looking at its slope or gradient. - Composite non-smooth objective: A complicated math problem with different parts that are not smooth or easy to work with. - Dense Gaussian variational families: A specific group of mathematical functions that are used in this type of problem-solving. - Reparameterization: A technique used to change

Provable Convergence Guarantees for Black-Box Variational Inference

Variational inference (VI) is a popular technique in machine learning that allows us to approximate complex distributions with simpler ones. It has been used to solve a wide range of problems, from natural language processing to computer vision. However, despite its widespread use, there have been few rigorous proofs of its effectiveness. This gap exists due to challenges posed by gradient estimators with unusual noise bounds and a composite non-smooth objective. In their paper titled “Provable convergence guarantees for black-box variational inference”, Justin Domke, Guillaume Garrigos and Robert Gower address this issue by focusing on dense Gaussian variational families and providing novel convergence guarantees for proximal and projected stochastic gradient descent using this bound. This research breakthrough is significant as it offers the first rigorous guarantee that black-box variational inference can converge for realistic inference problems. By establishing these provable convergence guarantees, the authors bridge a theoretical gap in existing stochastic optimization proofs which has important implications for the field of machine learning.

Background

Variational inference (VI) is an approach used in Bayesian statistics where we approximate complex distributions with simpler ones such as Gaussians or mixtures thereof. The goal is to find parameters that minimize the Kullback–Leibler divergence between the two distributions so that they are close enough that we can make accurate predictions about our data given our model assumptions. This process requires optimizing an objective function which consists of two components: a data term (the likelihood) and a regularization term (the prior). The challenge lies in finding parameters that simultaneously maximize both components while avoiding overfitting or underfitting our data - something known as posterior collapse or mode collapse respectively. To do this effectively requires careful tuning of hyperparameters such as step size and batch size when using gradient based methods like stochastic gradient descent (SGD).

Problem Statement

The problem addressed by Domke et al., was how to provide proof of successful optimization when using SGD on VI objectives with unusual noise bounds and composite non-smooth objectives? In other words, how could one prove mathematically that SGD would be able to accurately optimize VI objectives without overshooting or undershooting them?

Solution

To answer this question, Domke et al., focused on dense Gaussian variational families which are commonly used in VI applications due to their simplicity and flexibility compared to other types of distributions like mixtures thereof or Dirichlet processes etc.. They observed that existing gradient estimators based on reparameterization satisfy a quadratic noise bound which allowed them derive novel convergence guarantees for proximal and projected stochastic gradient descent using this bound - something not previously possible before their work was published .

Implications

By establishing these provable convergence guarantees, Domke et al., bridge an important theoretical gap in existing stochastic optimization proofs regarding black box variational inference techniques - something widely used but lacking formal proof until now . This finding has important implications for the field of machine learning since it means researchers can now trust more confidently in results obtained from VI models without worrying about potential issues related misoptimizing them due lack evidence supporting their efficacy .