Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners

AI-generated keywords: Zero-Shot Reasoners LLMs Chain of Thought Multi-Task Broad Cognitive Capabilities Few-Shot Examples

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Pretrained large language models (LLMs) have excellent few-shot learning abilities
  • Chain of thought (CoT) prompting elicits complex multi-step reasoning
  • CoT prompting achieves state-of-the-art performances in difficult system-2 tasks
  • LLMs can perform well as zero-shot reasoners by adding the phrase "Let's think step by step" before each answer
  • Zero-shot-CoT outperforms zero-shot LLM performances on diverse benchmark reasoning tasks
  • Zero-shot CoT increases accuracy on benchmark tasks significantly
  • The single prompt used in Zero-shot CoT is versatile across various reasoning tasks
  • LLMs have untapped and understudied fundamental zero shot capabilities
  • Simple prompting techniques can extract high level cognitive capabilities from LLMs
  • This paper serves as a strong zero shot baseline for challenging reasoning benchmarks
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, Yusuke Iwasawa

Abstract: Pretrained large language models (LLMs) are widely used in many sub-fields of natural language processing (NLP) and generally known as excellent few-shot learners with task-specific exemplars. Notably, chain of thought (CoT) prompting, a recent technique for eliciting complex multi-step reasoning through step-by-step answer examples, achieved the state-of-the-art performances in arithmetics and symbolic reasoning, difficult system-2 tasks that do not follow the standard scaling laws for LLMs. While these successes are often attributed to LLMs' ability for few-shot learning, we show that LLMs are decent zero-shot reasoners by simply adding ``Let's think step by step'' before each answer. Experimental results demonstrate that our Zero-shot-CoT, using the same single prompt template, significantly outperforms zero-shot LLM performances on diverse benchmark reasoning tasks including arithmetics (MultiArith, GSM8K, AQUA-RAT, SVAMP), symbolic reasoning (Last Letter, Coin Flip), and other logical reasoning tasks (Date Understanding, Tracking Shuffled Objects), without any hand-crafted few-shot examples, e.g. increasing the accuracy on MultiArith from 17.7% to 78.7% and GSM8K from 10.4% to 40.7% with an off-the-shelf 175B parameter model. The versatility of this single prompt across very diverse reasoning tasks hints at untapped and understudied fundamental zero-shot capabilities of LLMs, suggesting high-level, multi-task broad cognitive capabilities may be extracted through simple prompting. We hope our work not only serves as the minimal strongest zero-shot baseline for the challenging reasoning benchmarks, but also highlights the importance of carefully exploring and analyzing the enormous zero-shot knowledge hidden inside LLMs before crafting finetuning datasets or few-shot exemplars.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 May. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2205.11916v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners" discusses the capabilities of pretrained large language models (LLMs) in natural language processing (NLP). LLMs are known for their excellent few-shot learning abilities with task-specific exemplars. The authors highlight the success of a recent technique called chain of thought (CoT) prompting, which elicits complex multi-step reasoning through step-by-step answer examples. CoT prompting has achieved state-of-the-art performances in difficult system-2 tasks such as arithmetics and symbolic reasoning, which do not follow the standard scaling laws for LLMs. While these successes are often attributed to LLMs' ability for few-shot learning, the authors demonstrate that LLMs can also perform well as zero-shot reasoners by simply adding the phrase "Let's think step by step" before each answer. They introduce a new method called Zero-shot-CoT, which significantly outperforms zero-shot LLM performances on diverse benchmark reasoning tasks including arithmetics, symbolic reasoning, and other logical reasoning tasks. Notably, this improvement is achieved without any handcrafted few-shot examples. Experimental results show that Zero-shot CoT increases accuracy on benchmark tasks such as MultiArith from 17.7% to 78.7% and GSM8K from 10.4% to 40.7% using an off the shelf 175B parameter model. The authors emphasize the versatility of this single prompt across various reasoning tasks, suggesting untapped and understudied fundamental zero shot capabilities of LLMs. The findings of this study suggest that high level multi task broad cognitive capabilities can be extracted from LLMs through simple prompting techniques. The authors hope that their work serves as a strong zero shot baseline for challenging reasoning benchmarks and highlights the importance of exploring and analyzing the vast amount of hidden zero shot knowledge inside LLMs before crafting finetuning datasets or few shot exemplars. Overall, this paper sheds light on the zero shot reasoning abilities of LLMs and emphasizes the potential for extracting high level cognitive capabilities through simple prompting techniques.
Created on 27 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.