Examining Zero-Shot Vulnerability Repair with Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large language models (LLMs) can assist in repairing cybersecurity bugs in code
  • OpenAI's Codex and AI21's Jurassic J-1 are examples of LLMs used for zero-shot vulnerability repair
  • Challenges exist in designing prompts that effectively coax LLMs into generating repaired code due to semantic and syntactic variations in natural languages
  • Comprehensive study involving commercially available LLMs, an open-source model, and a locally-trained model was conducted
  • LLMs successfully repaired 100% of synthetically generated and hand-crafted scenarios
  • Challenges identified when generating functionally correct code from historical real-world examples
  • Emerging 'smart' code completion tools powered by LLMs have potential in addressing cybersecurity bugs introduced by human developers
  • Further improvements needed to ensure generation of functionally accurate code
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hammond Pearce, Benjamin Tan, Baleegh Ahmad, Ramesh Karri, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt

18 pages, 19 figures. Accepted for publication in 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)

Abstract: Human developers can produce code with cybersecurity bugs. Can emerging 'smart' code completion tools help repair those bugs? In this work, we examine the use of large language models (LLMs) for code (such as OpenAI's Codex and AI21's Jurassic J-1) for zero-shot vulnerability repair. We investigate challenges in the design of prompts that coax LLMs into generating repaired versions of insecure code. This is difficult due to the numerous ways to phrase key information - both semantically and syntactically - with natural languages. We perform a large scale study of five commercially available, black-box, "off-the-shelf" LLMs, as well as an open-source model and our own locally-trained model, on a mix of synthetic, hand-crafted, and real-world security bug scenarios. Our experiments demonstrate that while the approach has promise (the LLMs could collectively repair 100% of our synthetically generated and hand-crafted scenarios), a qualitative evaluation of the model's performance over a corpus of historical real-world examples highlights challenges in generating functionally correct code.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Dec. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2112.02125v3

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their research titled "Examining Zero-Shot Vulnerability Repair with Large Language Models," authors Hammond Pearce, Benjamin Tan, Baleegh Ahmad, Ramesh Karri, and Brendan Dolan-Gavitt explore the potential of large language models (LLMs) to assist in repairing cybersecurity bugs in code. They investigate the use of LLMs such as OpenAI's Codex and AI21's Jurassic J-1 for zero-shot vulnerability repair and analyze the challenges involved in designing prompts that can effectively coax LLMs into generating repaired versions of insecure code. The researchers highlight the difficulty in formulating prompts that convey key information accurately and comprehensively using natural language due to the semantic and syntactic variations present in natural languages. To evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs for vulnerability repair, they conduct a comprehensive study involving five commercially available black-box LLMs, an open-source model, and their own locally-trained model. The study encompasses a mix of synthetic scenarios, hand-crafted examples, and real-world security bug scenarios. The experiments demonstrate promising results as the collective performance of the LLMs successfully repairs 100% of synthetically generated and hand-crafted scenarios. However, when evaluating the models' performance on a corpus of historical real-world examples, they identify challenges in generating functionally correct code. Overall, this research sheds light on the potential role of emerging 'smart' code completion tools powered by LLMs in addressing cybersecurity bugs introduced by human developers. While there is promise in leveraging these tools for vulnerability repair, further improvements are necessary to ensure the generation of functionally accurate code.
Created on 30 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.