Tracing the Top-of-the-atmosphere and Vertical Cloud Structure of a fast-rotating late T-dwarf

AI-generated keywords: Brown dwarfs Spectro-photometric variability General Circulation Models Radiative-transfer models Cloud structures

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study focuses on atmospheric cloud structures of late-T brown dwarfs
  • Monitored 2MASSJ00501994-332240, a T7.0 rapidly rotating field brown dwarf with low-level photometric variability
  • Used MOSFIRE installed at the Keck I telescope to measure near-infrared spectro-photometric variability
  • Detected peak-to-peak amplitudes of fluctuations in different light curves:
  • 1.48±0.75% in J-band photometric light curve
  • 0.62±0.18% in J-band spectro-photometric light curve
  • 1.26±0.93% in H-band light curve
  • 5.33±2.02% in CH_4–H_2O band light curve
  • Bayesian Information Criterion did not detect significant variability due to detection limitations from MOSFIRE sensitivity; therefore only tentative low-level variability could be claimed for 2M0050–3322 under best-case scenarios.
  • Amplitudes of peak-to-peak fluctuations measured for 2MASSJ00501994–332240 agree with General Circulation Models' predictions for a T7.0 brown dwarf for an edge-on object's variability amplitude prediction.
  • Radiative-transfer models predict that Na_2S and KCl clouds condense at pressures lower than that traced by CH_4–H_2O bands which might explain higher peak-to-peak fluctuations measured for this light curve.
  • Authors provide visual recreation of maps provided by General Circulation Models and vertical structure provided by radiative transfer models comparing their results with other late T brown dwarfs and found several differences and commonalities between them such as only two other late T dwarfs have been monitored for spectro photometric variability: 2MASS J22282889 – 431026 (T6 .5) and Ross 458c (T7 .5).
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Elena Manjavacas, Theodora Karalidi, Xianyu Tan, Johanna M. Vos, Ben W. P. Lew, Beth A. Biller, Natalia Oliveros-Gomez

arXiv: 2206.07566v1 - DOI (astro-ph.SR)
Accepted at AJ June 13 2022
License: CC ZERO 1.0

Abstract: Only a handful of late-T brown dwarfs have been monitored for spectro-photometric variability, leaving incomplete the study of the atmospheric cloud structures of the coldest brown dwarfs, that share temperatures with some cold, directly-imaged exoplanets. 2MASSJ00501994-332240 is a T7.0 rapidly rotating, field brown dwarf that showed low-level photometric variability in data obtained with the Spitzer Space telescope. We monitored 2MASSJ00501994-332240 during ~2.6 hr with MOSFIRE, installed at the Keck I telescope, with the aim of constraining its near-infrared spectro-photometric variability. We measured fluctuations with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 1.48+\-0.75% in the J-band photometric light curve, an amplitude of 0.62+/-0.18% in the J-band spectro-photometric light curve, and an amplitude of 1.26+/-0.93% in the H-band light curve, and an amplitude of 5.33+/-2.02% in the CH_4-H_2O band light curve. Nevertheless, the Bayesian Information Criterion does not detect significant variability in any of the light curves. Thus, given the detection limitations due to the MOSFIRE sensitivity, we can only claim tentative low-level variability for 2M0050-3322 in the best-case scenario. The amplitudes of the peak-to-peak fluctuations measured for 2MASSJ00501994-332240 agree with the variability amplitude predictions of General Circulation Models for a T7.0 brown dwarf for an edge on object. Radiative-transfer models predict that the Na_2S and KCl clouds condense at pressures lower than that traced by the CH_4-H_2O band, which might explain the higher peak-to-peak fluctuations measured for this light curve. Finally, we provide a visual recreation of the map provided by General Circulation Models and the vertical structure of 2MASSJ00501994-332240 provided by radiative-transfer models.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Jun. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2206.07566v1

This study focuses on the atmospheric cloud structures of late-T brown dwarfs, which share temperatures with cold, directly-imaged exoplanets. The authors monitored 2MASSJ00501994-332240, a T7.0 rapidly rotating field brown dwarf that showed low-level photometric variability in data obtained with the Spitzer Space Telescope. They used MOSFIRE installed at the Keck I telescope to constrain its near-infrared spectro-photometric variability and measured fluctuations with peak-to-peak amplitudes of 1.48±0.75% in the J-band photometric light curve, 0.62±0.18% in the J-band spectro-photometric light curve, 1.26±0.93% in the H-band light curve, and 5.33±2.02% in the CH_4–H_2O band light curve. However, despite these measurements, the Bayesian Information Criterion did not detect significant variability in any of the light curves due to detection limitations from MOSFIRE sensitivity; therefore they could only claim tentative low–level variability for 2M0050–3322 under best–case scenarios. The amplitudes of peak–to–peak fluctuations measured for 2MASSJ00501994–332240 agree with General Circulation Models' predictions for a T7.0 brown dwarf for an edge–on object's variability amplitude prediction. Radiative–transfer models predict that Na_2S and KCl clouds condense at pressures lower than that traced by CH_4–H_2O bands which might explain higher peak–to–peak fluctuations measured for this light curve. The authors also provide a visual recreation of maps provided by General Circulation Models and vertical structure provided by radiative transfer models comparing their results with other late T brown dwarfs and found several differences and commonalities between them such as only two other late T dwarfs have been monitored for spectro photometric variability: 2MASS J22282889 – 431026 (T6 .5) and Ross 458c (T7 .5).
Created on 04 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.