The X-ray activity of F stars with hot Jupiters: KELT-24 versus WASP-18

Authors: I. Pillitteri, S. Colombo, G. Micela, S. J. Wolk

arXiv: 2304.00854v1 - DOI (astro-ph.SR)
6 pages, 7 figures, A&A accepted
License: CC BY 4.0
AI-generated keywords: X-ray activity solar-type stars KELT-24 WASP-18 star-planet interaction

AI-generated Key Points

  • X-ray activity is typically present in solar-type stars up to late-A types during the main sequence phase
  • F stars, with or without hot Jupiters, are usually X-ray emitters
  • The F5 star WASP-18 exhibits a very low level of X-ray emission despite its relatively young age and spectral type
  • KELT-24 was observed to test if its X-ray activity is depressed by the interaction with its massive hot Jupiter, similar to WASP-18
  • KELT-24 was detected in combined EPIC images with high significance and exhibited an average coronal spectrum described by a cool component at 0.36 keV and a hotter component at 0.98 keV
  • A flare lasting about 2 ks was also detected during which the coronal temperature reached 3.5 keV
  • The unabsorbed quiescent flux for KELT-24 falls within the range of typical X-ray luminosity for F stars in Hyades that are coeval with KELT‑24
  • From TESS light curve analysis it was inferred that there is a distribution of optical flares for both KELT‑24 and WASP‑18; however small optical flickering similar to flares were recognized in WASP‑18 but at lower levels of energy and amplitude than in KELT‑24.
  • The causes behind the low activity level exhibited by WASP‑18 were discussed: either WASP‑18b could hamper the formation of a corona bright in X-rays in its host star through some form of tidal interaction or the star has entered a minimum of activity similar to the solar Maunder minimum; making WASP‑18 one among few candidates showing such quench of stellar activity.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: X-rays emitted by the coronae of solar-type stars are a feature present in up to late-A types during the main sequence phase. F stars, either with or without hot Jupiters, are usually X-ray emitters. The very low level of X-ray emission of the F5 star WASP-18 despite its relatively young age and spectral type is thus quite peculiar. [Abridged] We observed KELT-24 with \xmm\ for a total of 43 ks in order to test if the X-ray activity of this star is depressed by the interaction with its massive hot Jupiter, as is the case of WASP-18. KELT-24 is detected in combined EPIC images with a high significance level. Its average coronal spectrum is well described by a cool component at 0.36 keV and a hotter component at 0.98 keV. We detected a flare with a duration of about 2 ks, during which the coronal temperature reached 3.5 keV. The unabsorbed quiescent flux in 0.3-8.0 keV is $\sim1.33\times10^{-13}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, corresponding to a luminosity of $1.5\times10^{29}$ erg s$^{-1}$ at the distance of the star. The luminosity is well within the range of the typical X-ray luminosity of F stars in Hyades, which are coeval. We conclude that the activity of KELT-24 appears normal, as expected, and is not affected by any star--planet interaction. From the analysis of TESS light curves, we infer a distribution of optical flares for KELT-24 and WASP-18. Small optical flickering similar to flares is recognized in WASP-18 but at lower levels of energy and amplitude than in KELT-24. We discuss the causes of the low activity of WASP-18. Either WASP-18b could hamper the formation of a corona bright in X-rays in its host star through some form of tidal interaction, or the star has entered a minimum of activity similar to the solar Maunder minimum. This latter hypothesis would make WASP-18 among the few candidates showing such a quench of stellar activity.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Apr. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.00854v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The X-ray activity of solar-type stars is typically present up to late-A types during the main sequence phase. F stars, with or without hot Jupiters, are usually X-ray emitters. However, the F5 star WASP-18 exhibits a very low level of X-ray emission despite its relatively young age and spectral type, which is quite peculiar. In contrast, KELT-24 was observed with \xmm\ for a total of 43 ks to test if its X-ray activity is depressed by the interaction with its massive hot Jupiter, similar to WASP-18. KELT-24 was detected in combined EPIC images with high significance and exhibited an average coronal spectrum described by a cool component at 0.36 keV and a hotter component at 0.98 keV. A flare lasting about 2 ks was also detected during which the coronal temperature reached 3.5 keV. The unabsorbed quiescent flux in the range of 0.3–8.0 keV for KELT-24 was found to be $\sim1.33\times10^{−13}$ erg s$^{−1}$ cm$^{−2}$, corresponding to a luminosity of $1.5\times10^{29}$ erg s$^{−1}$ at the distance of the star, which falls within the range of typical X-ray luminosity for F stars in Hyades that are coeval with KELT‑24. From TESS light curve analysis it was inferred that there is a distribution of optical flares for both KELT‑24 and WASP‑18; however small optical flickering similar to flares were recognized in WASP‑18 but at lower levels of energy and amplitude than in KELT‑24. The causes behind the low activity level exhibited by WASP‑18 were discussed: either WASP‑18b could hamper the formation of a corona bright in X‑rays in its host star through some form of tidal interaction or the star has entered a minimum of activity similar to the solar Maunder minimum; making WASP‑18 one among few candidates showing such quench of stellar activity.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.