Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2207.11116v1

In the article "Citation Models and Research Evaluation," V.A. Traag explores the study of citations in science from multiple perspectives, including scientometrics and the science of science. The author provides a comprehensive review of literature on citations, citation distributions, and models of citations to understand their relevance to research evaluation and the role of metrics and indicators in that process. The article also examines how citations relate to peer review and aims to integrate both literatures for a better understanding of each other. The fundamental problem in research evaluation is that research quality is unobservable which has implications for conclusions drawn from quantitative studies of citations and citation models. To address this issue, the term "indicators" is discussed as an important concept in this context which requires proper causal reasoning when used in practice because entering causal territory may invalidate even valid indicators. By combining citation models with proper causal reasoning while acknowledging the fundamental problem about unobservable research quality, progress can be made towards better research evaluation. This article serves as a draft for a chapter in the Handbook of Computational Social Science edited by Taha Yasseri forthcoming 2023 from Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

• - The article "Citation Models and Research Evaluation" explores the study of citations in science from multiple perspectives, including scientometrics and the science of science.
• - The author provides a comprehensive review of literature on citations, citation distributions, and models of citations to understand their relevance to research evaluation and the role of metrics and indicators in that process.
• - The article examines how citations relate to peer review and aims to integrate both literatures for a better understanding of each other.
• - The fundamental problem in research evaluation is that research quality is unobservable which has implications for conclusions drawn from quantitative studies of citations and citation models.
• - To address this issue, the term "indicators" is discussed as an important concept in this context which requires proper causal reasoning when used in practice because entering causal territory may invalidate even valid indicators.
• - By combining citation models with proper causal reasoning while acknowledging the fundamental problem about unobservable research quality, progress can be made towards better research evaluation.
• - This article serves as a draft for a chapter in the Handbook of Computational Social Science edited by Taha Yasseri forthcoming 2023 from Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

This article talks about how scientists use citations to show where they got their ideas from. They also talk about how to measure the quality of research using these citations. The author explains that it's hard to know if a citation really means the research was good, so we need to be careful when using them. They suggest using "indicators" as a way to help with this problem, but we need to be careful not to assume too much based on just one indicator. By being thoughtful and combining different ways of measuring research quality, we can do better science. Definitions- Citations: When someone mentions another person's work in their own writing or research. - Scientometrics: The study of scientific publications and their impact. - Research evaluation: The process of determining the quality and impact of scientific research. - Indicators: Measurements used to evaluate something, like how many times a paper has been cited by other researchers.

Citation Models and Research Evaluation: A Comprehensive Review

In his article "Citation Models and Research Evaluation," V.A. Traag explores the study of citations in science from multiple perspectives, including scientometrics and the science of science. Through a comprehensive review of literature on citations, citation distributions, and models of citations, he examines how they relate to research evaluation and the role of metrics and indicators in that process. The article also aims to integrate both literatures for a better understanding of each other.

The Fundamental Problem with Research Evaluation

The fundamental problem in research evaluation is that research quality is unobservable which has implications for conclusions drawn from quantitative studies of citations and citation models. To address this issue, the term "indicators" is discussed as an important concept in this context which requires proper causal reasoning when used in practice because entering causal territory may invalidate even valid indicators.

Integrating Citation Models with Causal Reasoning

By combining citation models with proper causal reasoning while acknowledging the fundamental problem about unobservable research quality, progress can be made towards better research evaluation. This article serves as a draft for a chapter in the Handbook of Computational Social Science edited by Taha Yasseri forthcoming 2023 from Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., making it an essential read for anyone interested in understanding more about citation models and their relevance to research evaluation.