Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2002.06961v1

The overload of published scientific works in recent years has made it increasingly difficult to identify the most appropriate publications when writing scientific texts. As a result, citation recommendation has emerged as an important research topic. Citation recommendation describes the task of recommending citations for a given text, and in recent years, several approaches and evaluation data sets have been presented. In their article titled "Citation Recommendation: Approaches and Datasets," authors Michael Färber and Adam Jatowt provide a thorough introduction into automatic citation recommendation research. They present an overview of the approaches and data sets for citation recommendation, identifying differences and commonalities using various dimensions. The authors also shed light on evaluation methods and outline general challenges in the evaluation process, including how to meet them. While they restrict themselves to citation recommendation for scientific publications, they note that many of these observations and discussions are also applicable to other types of text such as news articles and encyclopedic articles. Overall, this article provides valuable insights into the field of citation recommendation and serves as a useful resource for researchers looking to improve their understanding of this important area of study.

• - Overload of published scientific works makes it difficult to identify appropriate publications for citation
• - Citation recommendation is an important research topic
• - Citation recommendation involves recommending citations for a given text
• - Several approaches and evaluation data sets have been presented in recent years
• - "Citation Recommendation: Approaches and Datasets" by Michael Färber and Adam Jatowt provides a thorough introduction into automatic citation recommendation research
• - The authors present an overview of the approaches and data sets for citation recommendation, identifying differences and commonalities using various dimensions
• - The article sheds light on evaluation methods and outlines general challenges in the evaluation process, including how to meet them
• - Observations and discussions are applicable to other types of text such as news articles and encyclopedic articles
• - Valuable insights into the field of citation recommendation
• - Useful resource for researchers looking to improve their understanding of this important area of study.

Summary: Sometimes there are too many scientific papers to read and it's hard to find the right ones. Citation recommendation helps suggest good papers to use in research. People have different ways of doing this and there are some examples that have been studied. A book called "Citation Recommendation: Approaches and Datasets" explains more about how this works and gives tips for evaluating it. This can also be helpful for other types of writing like news or encyclopedia articles. Definitions- Overload: when there is too much of something - Published: when a piece of writing has been printed or put online for people to read - Citation: when you mention another person's work in your own writing - Recommendation: when you suggest something as a good idea or option - Evaluation: when you look at something carefully to see how well it works

Citation Recommendation: Approaches and Datasets

In recent years, the sheer volume of published scientific works has made it increasingly difficult to identify the most appropriate publications when writing scientific texts. As a result, citation recommendation has emerged as an important research topic. Citation recommendation describes the task of recommending citations for a given text, and in this article titled "Citation Recommendation: Approaches and Datasets," authors Michael Färber and Adam Jatowt provide a thorough introduction into automatic citation recommendation research.

Overview of Approaches and Data Sets

The authors present an overview of the approaches and data sets for citation recommendation, identifying differences and commonalities using various dimensions. They discuss two main categories of approaches - supervised learning-based methods that use labeled training data to learn from past examples; and unsupervised methods that rely on heuristics or statistical models without any labeled training data. The authors also compare different datasets used for evaluation purposes in terms of their size, type (e.g., bibliographic records), language coverage, etc., noting that many datasets are limited in terms of their size or language coverage which can affect performance results.

Evaluation Methods

The authors shed light on evaluation methods used to assess the performance of citation recommendations systems including precision/recall metrics, ranking metrics such as mean reciprocal rank (MRR) or normalized discounted cumulative gain (nDCG), user studies with human subjects, etc.. They also outline general challenges associated with evaluating these systems such as how to properly measure relevance between documents; how to handle noisy labels; how to account for temporal changes in document collections; etc..

General Observations

While they restrict themselves to citation recommendation for scientific publications, they note that many of these observations and discussions are also applicable to other types of text such as news articles and encyclopedic articles. Overall, this article provides valuable insights into the field of citation recommendation by providing an overview of existing approaches along with discussion about evaluation methods used in this area. It serves as a useful resource for researchers looking to improve their understanding of this important area study.