An Overview of the Data-Loader Landscape: Comparative Performance Analysis

AI-generated keywords: DataLoader Performance Deep Learning Optimization Benchmark

AI-generated Key Points

  • Data loaders are important for improving the performance of training machine learning models
  • Recent advancements in data loaders have shown promise in reducing training time and offering new features
  • Dataloaders are a separate component in the Deep Learning workflow with a defined structure and features
  • An open-source benchmark comparing popular data loading libraries in PyTorch has been developed
  • The benchmark will be updated with new libraries and datasets as interest grows
  • Remote training using a data stream over a public internet connection is viable under reasonable circumstances
  • The impact of computing serving the data is highlighted, contrasting previous assumptions about locally cached datasets after download
  • A novel approach to hyperparameter optimization for speed is introduced, aiming for at least an order of magnitude faster results compared to traditional approaches
  • The paper provides valuable insights into dataloaders' role in enhancing training job performance
  • It offers a comprehensive comparison of different dataloading libraries considering functionality, usability, and performance trade-offs
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Iason Ofeidis, Diego Kiedanski, Leandros Tassiulas

17 pages, 28 figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Dataloaders, in charge of moving data from storage into GPUs while training machine learning models, might hold the key to drastically improving the performance of training jobs. Recent advances have shown promise not only by considerably decreasing training time but also by offering new features such as loading data from remote storage like S3. In this paper, we are the first to distinguish the dataloader as a separate component in the Deep Learning (DL) workflow and to outline its structure and features. Finally, we offer a comprehensive comparison of the different dataloading libraries available, their trade-offs in terms of functionality, usability, and performance and the insights derived from them.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Sep. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2209.13705v1

The paper titled "An Overview of the Data-Loader Landscape: Comparative Performance Analysis" explores the importance of data loaders in improving the performance of training machine learning models. Dataloaders are responsible for moving data from storage into GPUs during training, and recent advancements have shown promise in reducing training time and offering new features like loading data from remote storage. The authors distinguish the dataloader as a separate component in the Deep Learning (DL) workflow and provide an outline of its structure and features. They also develop an open-source benchmark that compares popular data loading libraries in PyTorch. This benchmark will remain available to the community for adding new libraries and datasets as interest grows, with plans to update numerical results following major updates to any of the benchmarked libraries. Additionally, the paper demonstrates the viability of remote training by showing that it is possible to train a machine learning model using a data stream over a public internet connection under reasonable circumstances. They highlight the impact of computing serving the data, contrasting their approach with previous assumptions about locally cached datasets after download. The authors introduce a novel approach to hyperparameter optimization for speed, optimizing for processed samples over time as a proxy for total running time. This optimization is hardware-dependent and should be performed before long-running jobs, aiming to achieve at least an order of magnitude faster results compared to equivalent traditional approaches. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into dataloaders' role in enhancing training job performance. It offers a comprehensive comparison of different dataloading libraries considering their functionality, usability, and performance trade-offs. The findings contribute to advancing research on efficient deep learning workflows and can guide practitioners in selecting appropriate dataloading strategies for their specific needs.
Created on 12 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.