Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2210.09932v1

In this study, the researchers focus on lay summarisation, which involves summarising and simplifying complex texts to make them more understandable for non-experts. They highlight the importance of automatic approaches for lay summarisation in broadening access to scientific literature and facilitating interdisciplinary knowledge sharing and public understanding of research findings. However, they note that current datasets for this task are limited in size and scope, hindering the development of effective data-driven approaches. To address these limitations, the researchers introduce two new lay summarisation datasets: PLOS (large-scale) and eLife (medium-scale). These datasets contain biomedical journal articles along with expert-written lay summaries. The researchers thoroughly characterize the lay summaries in these datasets, noting differences in readability and abstractiveness that can cater to different application needs. The researchers then benchmark their datasets using mainstream summarisation approaches and conduct a manual evaluation with domain experts. Through this evaluation, they demonstrate the utility of their datasets and shed light on key challenges in the task of lay summarisation. Additionally, they provide their code and datasets for public access. In related work, the researchers discuss previous attempts at automatically summarising scientific content for non-experts. They mention the LaySumm subtask of CL-SciSumm 2020 shared task series as well as other efforts using sources like The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and science news websites. They highlight limitations in existing datasets and models for lay summarisation, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive resources like PLOS and eLife. Overall, this study contributes valuable insights into lay summarisation by introducing new datasets, evaluating existing approaches, and addressing key challenges in making scientific literature more accessible to a wider audience.

• - Lay summarisation simplifies complex texts for non-experts
• - Automatic approaches are crucial for broadening access to scientific literature
• - Current datasets for lay summarisation are limited in size and scope
• - Introduction of new lay summarisation datasets: PLOS (large-scale) and eLife (medium-scale)
• - Characterization of lay summaries in the datasets, noting differences in readability and abstractiveness
• - Benchmarking of datasets using mainstream summarisation approaches and manual evaluation with domain experts
• - Public availability of code and datasets provided by researchers
• - Discussion on previous attempts at automatically summarising scientific content for non-experts
• - Highlighting limitations in existing datasets and models, emphasizing the need for comprehensive resources like PLOS and eLife

Summary1. Lay summarization makes hard texts easier for people who are not experts. 2. Using automatic methods is important to help more people read scientific papers. 3. The current datasets for lay summarization are small and limited. 4. New datasets like PLOS and eLife are being introduced to help with lay summarization. 5. Researchers are comparing these datasets to see how easy they are to read and understand. Definitions- Lay summarisation: Making complex information simpler for people who are not experts. - Automatic approaches: Methods that use machines or computers to do tasks without human input. - Datasets: Collections of data used for research or analysis. - Readability: How easy something is to read and understand. - Abstractiveness: How much a summary includes the main points without extra details.

Introduction: In today's fast-paced world, access to information is crucial for staying informed and making well-informed decisions. However, with the increasing amount of complex scientific literature being published, it can be challenging for non-experts to understand and utilize this information effectively. This is where lay summarisation comes in - a process that involves simplifying and summarising complex texts to make them more accessible to a wider audience. The Study: In their research paper titled "Automatic Lay Summarisation: A New Dataset and Evaluation Framework", the authors focus on the task of lay summarisation and its importance in broadening access to scientific literature. They highlight how automatic approaches can facilitate interdisciplinary knowledge sharing and improve public understanding of research findings. However, they note that current datasets for this task are limited in size and scope, hindering the development of effective data-driven approaches. To address these limitations, the researchers introduce two new lay summarisation datasets - PLOS (large-scale) and eLife (medium-scale). These datasets contain biomedical journal articles along with expert-written lay summaries. Characterizing the Datasets: To thoroughly characterize the lay summaries in their datasets, the researchers analyze differences in readability and abstractiveness that can cater to different application needs. They also benchmark their datasets using mainstream summarization approaches and conduct a manual evaluation with domain experts. Through this evaluation, they demonstrate the utility of their datasets by showcasing how existing models perform on them. They also shed light on key challenges in the task of lay summarization such as identifying relevant information from long documents while maintaining coherence and readability. Open Access Resources: One significant contribution of this study is providing open access resources for researchers working on lay summarisation. The authors provide their code and datasets publicly available for others to use freely. This will not only help advance research in this field but also promote transparency and reproducibility. Related Work: In related work, the researchers discuss previous attempts at automatically summarizing scientific content for non-experts. They mention the LaySumm subtask of CL-SciSumm 2020 shared task series, which focuses on summarizing scientific articles from the computer science domain. They also highlight other efforts using sources like The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and science news websites. However, they point out limitations in existing datasets and models for lay summarisation, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive resources like PLOS and eLife. This further highlights the significance of their research in providing new datasets that can help address these limitations. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study contributes valuable insights into lay summarisation by introducing new datasets, evaluating existing approaches, and addressing key challenges in making scientific literature more accessible to a wider audience. With their open access resources and thorough characterization of their datasets, the researchers have provided a solid foundation for future research in this field. This will not only benefit non-experts looking to understand complex scientific literature but also aid researchers in effectively communicating their findings to a broader audience.