Dark patterns in e-commerce: a dataset and its baseline evaluations
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Dark patterns in online services can induce users into taking unintended actions
- There is a need for research on detecting these patterns
- Yuki Yada, Jiaying Feng, Tsuneo Matsumoto, Nao Fukushima, Fuyuko Kido and Hayato Yamana constructed a dataset for dark pattern detection
- The dataset was obtained from Mathur et al.'s study in 2019 which consisted of 1,818 dark pattern texts from shopping sites
- Negative samples were added to make the dataset more comprehensive by retrieving texts from the same websites as Mathur et al.'s dataset
- State-of-the-art machine learning methods including BERT, RoBERTa, ALBERT and XLNet were applied to show the automatic detection accuracy as baselines
- Through 5-fold cross-validation they achieved the highest accuracy of 0.975 with RoBERTa
- The authors' work provides an important contribution towards detecting dark patterns in e-commerce
- Their dataset and baseline source codes are publicly available at https://github.com/yamanalab/ec-darkpattern
Authors: Yuki Yada, Jiaying Feng, Tsuneo Matsumoto, Nao Fukushima, Fuyuko Kido, Hayato Yamana
Abstract: Dark patterns, which are user interface designs in online services, induce users to take unintended actions. Recently, dark patterns have been raised as an issue of privacy and fairness. Thus, a wide range of research on detecting dark patterns is eagerly awaited. In this work, we constructed a dataset for dark pattern detection and prepared its baseline detection performance with state-of-the-art machine learning methods. The original dataset was obtained from Mathur et al.'s study in 2019, which consists of 1,818 dark pattern texts from shopping sites. Then, we added negative samples, i.e., non-dark pattern texts, by retrieving texts from the same websites as Mathur et al.'s dataset. We also applied state-of-the-art machine learning methods to show the automatic detection accuracy as baselines, including BERT, RoBERTa, ALBERT, and XLNet. As a result of 5-fold cross-validation, we achieved the highest accuracy of 0.975 with RoBERTa. The dataset and baseline source codes are available at https://github.com/yamanalab/ec-darkpattern.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.