Photometric detection of internal gravity waves in upper main-sequence stars. III. Comparison of amplitude spectrum fitting and Gaussian process regression using celerite2
AI-generated Key Points
- Space telescopes such as CoRoT, Kepler/K2, and TESS have provided a wealth of time series photometric data on massive stars
- Stochastic low-frequency (SLF) variability has been observed in essentially all early-type main-sequence stars and has also been reported in later evolutionary stages of massive stars
- The authors aim to compare the properties of SLF variability in massive main-sequence stars observed by the TESS mission using different statistical methods
- There is a correlation between the morphology of SLF variability and a star's location in the HR diagram
- GP regression is a useful methodology to efficiently characterize SLF variability in massive stars compared to previous techniques used in literature
- There exists a correlation between a star's SLF variability, particularly its characteristic frequency, and its location on the HR diagram for main-sequence massive stars
- Coherency is also dependent on mass and age
Authors: Dominic M. Bowman, Trevor Z. Dorn-Wallenstein
Abstract: Studies of massive stars using space photometry have revealed that they commonly exhibit stochastic low-frequency (SLF) variability. This has been interpreted as being caused by internal gravity waves (IGWs) excited at the interface of convective and radiative regions within stellar interiors, such as the convective core or sub-surface convection zones. We aim to compare the properties of SLF variability in massive main-sequence stars observed by the TESS mission determined by different statistical methods, and confirm the correlation between the morphology of SLF variability and a star's location in the HR diagram. From a sample of 30 massive stars observed by TESS, we compare the resultant parameters of SLF variability, in particular the characteristic frequency, obtained from fitting the amplitude spectrum of the light curve with those inferred from fitting the covariance structure of the light curve using the celerite2 Gaussian process (GP) regression software and a damped SHO kernel. We find a difference in the characteristic frequency obtained from the amplitude spectrum fitting and from fitting the co-variance structure of the light curve using a GP regression with celerite2 for only a minority of the considered sample. However, the trends among mass, age and the properties of SLF variability previously reported remain unaffected. GP regression is a useful and novel methodology to efficiently characterise SLF variability in massive stars compared to previous techniques used in the literature. We conclude that the correlation between a star's SLF variability, in particular the characteristic frequency, and its location in the HR diagram is robust for main-sequence massive stars. There also exists a distribution in the stochasticity of SLF variability in massive stars, which indicates that the coherency of SLF variability is also a function of mass and age in massive stars.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.