Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2212.11261v2

A study conducted by Socher et al. found evidence of AI bias related to sexual objectification in language-vision models trained on web scrapes using the Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) objective. The researchers replicated three psychology experiments and discovered that this bias persists in AI systems. The first experiment showed that human characteristics were disassociated from images of objectified women, with emotions being overlooked by the model depending on the subject's clothing. In a second experiment, an automatic image captioner called Antarctic Captions used words denoting emotion less frequently for partially clothed women compared to fully clothed women. A third experiment revealed that images of female professionals were more likely to be associated with sexual descriptions than images of male professionals. Lastly, a fourth experiment demonstrated that prompts like "a [age] year old girl" led to the generation of sexualized images up to 73% of the time for certain AI models, highlighting the importance of addressing and mitigating biases in AI systems for fair and ethical outcomes.

• - Study by Socher et al. found evidence of AI bias related to sexual objectification in language-vision models trained on web scrapes using CLIP objective
• - Bias persists in AI systems as shown through replicated psychology experiments
• - Human characteristics disassociated from images of objectified women based on clothing, emotions overlooked by model
• - Antarctic Captions used emotion words less for partially clothed women compared to fully clothed women
• - Female professionals more likely associated with sexual descriptions than male professionals
• - Prompts like "a [age] year old girl" led to generation of sexualized images up to 73% of the time for certain AI models

Summary1. A study found that AI can be biased in how it sees things, especially related to treating women as objects. 2. This bias is still present in AI systems, as shown by repeated experiments. 3. The AI models sometimes miss important human traits like emotions when looking at pictures of women. 4. Words related to feelings are used less for women in certain clothing in Antarctica. 5. Women are more likely to be described sexually compared to men by AI, and specific prompts can lead to inappropriate images being generated. Definitions- Bias: When something or someone shows unfair favoritism towards one group over another. - Objectification: Treating someone as an object rather than a person with feelings and thoughts. - Emotions: Feelings like happiness, sadness, anger, etc., that people experience. - Professionals: People who have specialized knowledge and skills in a particular job or field. - Sexualized: Making something or someone appear sexual in nature or content.

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly prevalent in our daily lives, from virtual assistants to self-driving cars. However, as AI systems are trained on large datasets scraped from the internet, they can inherit societal biases and perpetuate them in their decision-making processes. A recent study conducted by Socher et al. found evidence of AI bias related to sexual objectification in language-vision models trained on web scrapes using the Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) objective. This research sheds light on the need for addressing and mitigating biases in AI systems for fair and ethical outcomes. Background: The researchers replicated three psychology experiments that have previously shown evidence of human bias towards sexual objectification. These experiments aimed to understand how humans perceive images of women based on their clothing or profession. The first experiment showed that human characteristics were disassociated from images of objectified women, with emotions being overlooked by the model depending on the subject's clothing. In a second experiment, an automatic image captioner called Antarctic Captions used words denoting emotion less frequently for partially clothed women compared to fully clothed women. Lastly, a fourth experiment demonstrated that prompts like "a [age] year old girl" led to the generation of sexualized images up to 73% of the time for certain AI models. Findings: The results of these experiments revealed that this bias persists in AI systems trained using CLIP objective. The first experiment showed that when presented with images of partially clothed women, emotions such as happiness or sadness were not associated with them by the model as often as they were with fully clothed women. This suggests that even though both sets of images may contain similar emotional expressions, the model was biased towards associating emotions more strongly with fully clothed individuals. In the second experiment, Antarctic Captions generated captions for images based on their perceived emotional content. It was found that partially clothed women were less likely to be associated with words denoting emotion compared to fully clothed women. This further reinforces the notion that AI systems trained on web scrapes can inherit societal biases and perpetuate them in their decision-making processes. The third experiment revealed a gender bias in how images of professionals are perceived. Images of female professionals were more likely to be associated with sexual descriptions than images of male professionals. This highlights the need for addressing not only sexual objectification but also gender stereotypes in AI systems. Implications: These findings have significant implications for the development and use of AI systems. As these systems become increasingly integrated into our daily lives, it is crucial to ensure that they do not perpetuate societal biases and discrimination. The study by Socher et al. highlights the need for developing techniques to mitigate bias in AI systems, especially those trained on large datasets scraped from the internet. Moreover, this research also raises ethical concerns regarding the impact of biased AI on individuals and society as a whole. Biased decisions made by AI systems can have real-world consequences, such as reinforcing harmful stereotypes or discriminating against certain groups of people. Conclusion: In conclusion, Socher et al.'s study provides evidence of AI bias related to sexual objectification in language-vision models trained using CLIP objective. The replication of three psychology experiments demonstrates that this bias persists in AI systems and has implications for fairness and ethics in decision-making processes. It is essential for researchers, developers, and policymakers to address these biases proactively and work towards creating fairer and more ethical AI systems for a better future.