Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2212.11672v1

The paper titled "Trustworthy Social Bias Measurement" addresses the challenge of designing reliable measures of social bias. While previous research has introduced various measures, none have gained widespread trust, leading to doubts about their effectiveness. In this work, the authors propose a new approach to bias measurement based on the cross-disciplinary theory of measurement modeling. They aim to overcome the vague treatment of social bias in natural language processing (NLP) by providing an explicit definition grounded in principles from social science research. To operationalize their definition, the authors introduce a general bias measurement framework called DivDist. This framework serves as a basis for implementing five concrete bias measures and a rigorous testing protocol consisting of eight criteria including predictive validity. The authors demonstrate considerable evidence supporting the trustworthiness of their measures and show that they address conceptual, technical and empirical deficiencies present in previous measures. In addition to addressing existing gaps in social bias measurement, this paper also discusses related work in the field. It highlights the qualitative characterization of social bias across various disciplines in the social sciences and notes that quantitative measures proposed thus far have not been widely adopted for measuring bias in NLP datasets despite their significant role text corpora play in language models and growing interest in dataset documentation and governance. Overall, this paper presents a comprehensive approach to designing trustworthy measures of social bias. By explicitly defining social bias and developing a robust measurement framework, the authors contribute to advancing research on mitigating biases in NLP datasets and models.

• - The paper addresses the challenge of designing reliable measures of social bias
• - Previous measures of social bias have not gained widespread trust
• - The authors propose a new approach to bias measurement based on measurement modeling theory
• - They introduce a general bias measurement framework called DivDist
• - The framework includes five concrete bias measures and a rigorous testing protocol with eight criteria
• - The authors provide evidence supporting the trustworthiness of their measures and address deficiencies in previous measures
• - The paper discusses related work in the field, including qualitative characterization of social bias and lack of adoption of quantitative measures in NLP datasets
• - Overall, the paper presents a comprehensive approach to designing trustworthy measures of social bias in NLP datasets and models.

The paper talks about how to measure social bias in a fair way. The authors came up with a new way to do this called DivDist. They tested their method and found it to be reliable. They also talked about other ways people have tried to measure bias before, but those methods were not trusted by everyone. This paper is important because it helps us make sure that the things we use, like computer programs, are not biased." Definitions- Social Bias: When someone has unfair opinions or treats people differently based on things like their race or gender. - Reliable: Something that can be trusted and is accurate. - Measurement Modeling Theory: A way of studying how to accurately measure something. - Framework: A plan or structure for doing something. - Trustworthiness: Being able to trust something or someone.

Trustworthy Social Bias Measurement: A Comprehensive Approach

Social bias is a pervasive issue in natural language processing (NLP) datasets and models, yet reliable measures of it have been elusive. In the paper titled “Trustworthy Social Bias Measurement”, the authors present an explicit definition of social bias grounded in principles from social science research and introduce a general framework called DivDist for measuring it. This comprehensive approach to designing trustworthy measures of social bias addresses existing gaps in the field by providing five concrete bias measures and a rigorous testing protocol consisting of eight criteria including predictive validity.

Explicit Definition of Social Bias

The authors begin by introducing an explicit definition of social bias based on cross-disciplinary theory of measurement modeling. This definition serves as a basis for their proposed framework, which consists of five concrete measures that address various aspects such as gender, race/ethnicity, age, religion and political orientation. These measures are designed to be applicable across different domains and languages while also being sensitive enough to capture subtle differences between groups. The authors also note that their approach is distinct from previous attempts at measuring social biases due to its focus on qualitative characterization rather than quantitative metrics alone.

Rigorous Testing Protocol

To evaluate the trustworthiness of their proposed framework, the authors developed a rigorous testing protocol consisting of eight criteria including predictive validity. Through extensive experiments conducted with both synthetic data sets and real-world text corpora drawn from news articles, they demonstrate considerable evidence supporting the trustworthiness of their measurers compared to other approaches used in NLP research so far.

Related Work

In addition to addressing existing gaps in social bias measurement, this paper also discusses related work in the field such as qualitative characterization across various disciplines in the social sciences and quantitative measures proposed thus far for measuring biases in NLP datasets despite growing interest in dataset documentation and governance.

Conclusion

Overall, this paper presents a comprehensive approach to designing trustworthy measures of social bias through an explicit definition grounded in principles from social science research combined with five concrete bias measurements supported by a rigorous testing protocol consisting