A Data-Centric Approach for Improving Adversarial Training Through the Lens of Out-of-Distribution Detection
AI-generated Key Points
- Researchers address the issue of adversarial perturbations in machine learning models
- Adversarial training is identified as an effective solution, where models are trained using adversarially perturbed samples
- Existing model-based methods can be equivalent to applying smaller perturbation or optimization weights to hard training examples
- Researchers propose a data-centric approach by detecting and removing hard samples directly from the training procedure
- Maximum softmax probability is used for out-of-distribution detection to identify hard samples
- Experiments conducted on SVHN and CIFAR-10 datasets show significant improvement in adversarial training by removing hard samples
- The proposed method enhances model robustness against adversarial perturbations.
Authors: Mohammad Azizmalayeri, Arman Zarei, Alireza Isavand, Mohammad Taghi Manzuri, Mohammad Hossein Rohban
Abstract: Current machine learning models achieve super-human performance in many real-world applications. Still, they are susceptible against imperceptible adversarial perturbations. The most effective solution for this problem is adversarial training that trains the model with adversarially perturbed samples instead of original ones. Various methods have been developed over recent years to improve adversarial training such as data augmentation or modifying training attacks. In this work, we examine the same problem from a new data-centric perspective. For this purpose, we first demonstrate that the existing model-based methods can be equivalent to applying smaller perturbation or optimization weights to the hard training examples. By using this finding, we propose detecting and removing these hard samples directly from the training procedure rather than applying complicated algorithms to mitigate their effects. For detection, we use maximum softmax probability as an effective method in out-of-distribution detection since we can consider the hard samples as the out-of-distribution samples for the whole data distribution. Our results on SVHN and CIFAR-10 datasets show the effectiveness of this method in improving the adversarial training without adding too much computational cost.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.