Spawrious: A Benchmark for Fine Control of Spurious Correlation Biases
AI-generated Key Points
- Spawrious is a benchmark dataset that addresses the problem of spurious correlations (SCs) in image classification.
- SCs occur when a classifier relies on non-predictive features that happen to be correlated with the labels in the training data, leading to misclassifications during test time.
- The existing benchmark datasets suffer from various limitations, such as over-saturation or only containing one-to-one (O2O) SCs but no many-to-many (M2M) SCs arising between groups of spurious attributes and classes.
- To address these limitations, Spawrious presents \benchmark-\{O2O, M2M\}-\{Easy, Medium, Hard\}, an image classification benchmark suite containing spurious correlations between classes and backgrounds.
- The dataset contains approximately 152k high-quality images generated using a text-to-image model and an image captioning model to filter out unsuitable ones.
- The experimental results demonstrate that state-of-the-art group robustness methods struggle with Spawrious, particularly on the Hard splits where none of them achieved over 70% accuracy using a ResNet50 pretrained on ImageNet.
- By examining model misclassifications, researchers detected reliances on spurious backgrounds, demonstrating that Spawrious provides a significant challenge for image classification models.
- In addition to addressing background features' influence on SCs in image classification models, future work could instantiate desiderata with non-background spurious attributes and evaluate more generalization techniques on Spawrious.
- Overall, Spawrious provides a valuable benchmark dataset for evaluating the robustness of image classification models against spurious correlations arising from both one-to-one and many-to -many relationships between classes and background features.
Authors: Aengus Lynch, Gbètondji J-S Dovonon, Jean Kaddour, Ricardo Silva
Abstract: The problem of spurious correlations (SCs) arises when a classifier relies on non-predictive features that happen to be correlated with the labels in the training data. For example, a classifier may misclassify dog breeds based on the background of dog images. This happens when the backgrounds are correlated with other breeds in the training data, leading to misclassifications during test time. Previous SC benchmark datasets suffer from varying issues, e.g., over-saturation or only containing one-to-one (O2O) SCs, but no many-to-many (M2M) SCs arising between groups of spurious attributes and classes. In this paper, we present \benchmark-\{O2O, M2M\}-\{Easy, Medium, Hard\}, an image classification benchmark suite containing spurious correlations between classes and backgrounds. To create this dataset, we employ a text-to-image model to generate photo-realistic images and an image captioning model to filter out unsuitable ones. The resulting dataset is of high quality and contains approximately 152k images. Our experimental results demonstrate that state-of-the-art group robustness methods struggle with \benchmark, most notably on the Hard-splits with none of them getting over $70\%$ accuracy on the hardest split using a ResNet50 pretrained on ImageNet. By examining model misclassifications, we detect reliances on spurious backgrounds, demonstrating that our dataset provides a significant challenge.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.