Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2302.12173v2

Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly integrated into various applications, and their functionalities can be modulated via natural language prompts. However, this flexibility also renders them susceptible to targeted adversarial prompting, such as Prompt Injection (PI) attacks that allow attackers to override original instructions and controls. While it was previously assumed that the user is directly prompting the LLM, a new study argues that LLM-Integrated Applications blur the line between data and instructions, opening up new attack vectors using Indirect Prompt Injection. This allows adversaries to remotely exploit LLM-integrated applications by strategically injecting prompts into data likely to be retrieved without direct interface with the user. The authors derive a comprehensive taxonomy from a computer security perspective to systematically investigate impacts and vulnerabilities, including data theft, worming, information ecosystem contamination, and other novel security risks. They demonstrate the practical viability of these attacks against real-world systems like Bing's GPT-4 powered Chat and code-completion engines as well as synthetic applications built on GPT-4. The study shows how processing retrieved prompts can act as arbitrary code execution, manipulate an application's functionality and control whether or not other APIs are called. Despite increasing integration and reliance on LLMs in various applications, effective mitigations for these emerging threats are currently lacking. By raising awareness of these vulnerabilities and providing key insights into their implications, the authors aim to promote safe and responsible deployment of these powerful models while developing robust defenses that protect users and systems from potential attacks.

• - Large Language Models (LLMs) are being integrated into various applications
• - LLM functionalities can be modulated via natural language prompts
• - Flexibility of LLMs renders them susceptible to targeted adversarial prompting, such as Prompt Injection (PI) attacks
• - LLM-integrated applications blur the line between data and instructions, opening up new attack vectors using Indirect Prompt Injection
• - Adversaries can remotely exploit LLM-integrated applications by strategically injecting prompts into data likely to be retrieved without direct interface with the user
• - A comprehensive taxonomy is derived from a computer security perspective to systematically investigate impacts and vulnerabilities, including data theft, worming, information ecosystem contamination, and other novel security risks
• - The study demonstrates the practical viability of these attacks against real-world systems like Bing's GPT-4 powered Chat and code-completion engines as well as synthetic applications built on GPT-4
• - Processing retrieved prompts can act as arbitrary code execution, manipulate an application's functionality and control whether or not other APIs are called.
• - Effective mitigations for these emerging threats are currently lacking.
• - The authors aim to promote safe and responsible deployment of these powerful models while developing robust defenses that protect users and systems from potential attacks.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are being used in different applications and can be controlled by natural language prompts. However, they are vulnerable to targeted attacks like Prompt Injection (PI) which can manipulate their functionalities. LLM-integrated applications blur the line between data and instructions, making them susceptible to Indirect Prompt Injection attacks. Adversaries can exploit these vulnerabilities remotely by injecting prompts into data likely to be retrieved without direct interface with the user. These attacks can lead to data theft, worming, information ecosystem contamination, and other security risks. Definitions- Large Language Models (LLMs): computer programs that use artificial intelligence to generate human-like language. - Natural language prompts: commands or requests given in everyday language. - Vulnerable: open to attack or harm. - Indirect Prompt Injection: a type of attack where malicious code is injected into an application through indirect means. - Remote exploitation: taking control of a system from a distance without physically accessing it. - Mitigations: actions taken to reduce the severity or impact of something.

Large Language Models (LLMs) and the Threat of Indirect Prompt Injection

In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have become increasingly integrated into various applications, allowing users to modulate their functionalities via natural language prompts. While this flexibility is beneficial for many applications, it also renders them susceptible to targeted adversarial prompting, such as Prompt Injection (PI) attacks that allow attackers to override original instructions and controls. A new study published in the journal Computer Security argues that LLM-Integrated Applications blur the line between data and instructions, opening up new attack vectors using Indirect Prompt Injection. This allows adversaries to remotely exploit LLM-integrated applications by strategically injecting prompts into data likely to be retrieved without direct interface with the user. The authors derive a comprehensive taxonomy from a computer security perspective to systematically investigate impacts and vulnerabilities, including data theft, worming, information ecosystem contamination, and other novel security risks.

Demonstrating Practical Viability of PI Attacks

The authors demonstrate the practical viability of these attacks against real-world systems like Bing's GPT-4 powered Chat and code-completion engines as well as synthetic applications built on GPT-4. They show how processing retrieved prompts can act as arbitrary code execution, manipulate an application's functionality and control whether or not other APIs are called.

Lack of Effective Mitigations

Despite increasing integration and reliance on LLMs in various applications, effective mitigations for these emerging threats are currently lacking. By raising awareness of these vulnerabilities and providing key insights into their implications, the authors aim to promote safe and responsible deployment of these powerful models while developing robust defenses that protect users and systems from potential attacks.

Conclusion

This research paper highlights an important issue regarding Large Language Models: they are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection attacks which can be used by malicious actors for a variety of nefarious purposes such as data theft or worming information ecosystems. It is essential that developers take steps towards mitigating these risks through robust defense mechanisms so that users can continue taking advantage of LLMs without fear of exploitation or abuse.