Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild World

AI-generated keywords: Test-Time Adaptation Distribution Shifts Batch Norm Layer Entropy Minimization Real-World Conditions

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper investigates the effectiveness of test-time adaptation (TTA) in addressing distribution shifts between training and testing data.
  • TTA's online model updating can be unstable, hindering its deployment in real-world scenarios.
  • Batch norm layer is a crucial factor contributing to this instability.
  • TTA can perform more stably with batch-agnostic norm layers such as group or layer norm, but still suffers many failure cases.
  • Noisy test samples with large gradients may disturb the model adaption and result in collapsed trivial solutions where all samples are assigned the same class label.
  • A sharpness-aware and reliable entropy minimization method called SAR stabilizes TTA from two aspects: removing partial noisy samples with large gradients and encouraging model weights to go to a flat minimum so that it is robust to remaining noisy samples.
  • The proposed method demonstrates better performance than prior methods and is computationally efficient under wild test scenarios.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Shuaicheng Niu, Jiaxiang Wu, Yifan Zhang, Zhiquan Wen, Yaofo Chen, Peilin Zhao, Mingkui Tan

accepted by International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2023 as Notable-Top-5%; 27 pages, 10 figures, 18 tables

Abstract: Test-time adaptation (TTA) has shown to be effective at tackling distribution shifts between training and testing data by adapting a given model on test samples. However, the online model updating of TTA may be unstable and this is often a key obstacle preventing existing TTA methods from being deployed in the real world. Specifically, TTA may fail to improve or even harm the model performance when test data have: 1) mixed distribution shifts, 2) small batch sizes, and 3) online imbalanced label distribution shifts, which are quite common in practice. In this paper, we investigate the unstable reasons and find that the batch norm layer is a crucial factor hindering TTA stability. Conversely, TTA can perform more stably with batch-agnostic norm layers, \ie, group or layer norm. However, we observe that TTA with group and layer norms does not always succeed and still suffers many failure cases. By digging into the failure cases, we find that certain noisy test samples with large gradients may disturb the model adaption and result in collapsed trivial solutions, \ie, assigning the same class label for all samples. To address the above collapse issue, we propose a sharpness-aware and reliable entropy minimization method, called SAR, for further stabilizing TTA from two aspects: 1) remove partial noisy samples with large gradients, 2) encourage model weights to go to a flat minimum so that the model is robust to the remaining noisy samples. Promising results demonstrate that SAR performs more stably over prior methods and is computationally efficient under the above wild test scenarios.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Feb. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2302.12400v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild World" by Shuaicheng Niu, Jiaxiang Wu, Yifan Zhang, Zhiquan Wen, Yaofo Chen, Peilin Zhao and Mingkui Tan investigates the effectiveness of test-time adaptation (TTA) in addressing distribution shifts between training and testing data. While TTA has shown promising results in adapting a given model on test samples, its online model updating can be unstable which hinders its deployment in real-world scenarios. The authors identify that the batch norm layer is a crucial factor contributing to this instability and propose that TTA can perform more stably with batch-agnostic norm layers such as group or layer norm. However, they observe that even with these norms TTA still suffers many failure cases. By investigating these failure cases further, the authors find that certain noisy test samples with large gradients may disturb the model adaption and result in collapsed trivial solutions where all samples are assigned the same class label. To address this collapse issue they propose a sharpness-aware and reliable entropy minimization method called SAR which stabilizes TTA from two aspects: 1) removing partial noisy samples with large gradients and 2) encouraging model weights to go to a flat minimum so that it is robust to remaining noisy samples. The proposed method demonstrates better performance than prior methods and is computationally efficient under wild test scenarios where mixed distribution shifts, small batch sizes, and online imbalanced label distribution shifts are common. This paper provides valuable insights into unstable reasons behind TTA's performance issues while also presenting an effective solution for stabilizing it under challenging real-world conditions.
Created on 18 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.