Dynamic Competency Self-Assessment for Autonomous Agents

AI-generated keywords: Autonomous robots Human-Robot Teaming Event-Triggered Generalized Outcome Assessment (ET-GOA) Competency assessment Dynamic environments

AI-generated Key Points

  • Deployment of autonomous robots in complex environments presents challenges such as platform degradation, environmental uncertainties, and deviations from validated operation conditions.
  • These factors can make it difficult for human partners to understand the capabilities and limitations of robots.
  • Self-assessment of robot competency in dynamic and uncertain environments is crucial for successful human-robot teaming.
  • An Event-Triggered Generalized Outcome Assessment (ET-GOA) algorithm was evaluated for autonomous agents to dynamically assess task confidence during execution.
  • The ET-GOA algorithm uses a fast online statistical test of the agent's observations and its model predictions to determine when competency assessment is necessary.
  • Experimental results using ET-GOA to generate competency reports during a simulated delivery task showed significant effects on deliveries in both static and dynamic environments.
  • In the static environment, there were significant increases in deliveries with ET-GOA compared to random and with GOA compared to random. There was no difference between GOA and ET-GOA in the static environment.
  • In the dynamic environment, there were significant differences between all reporting conditions on deliveries.
  • Self-assessing agents using algorithms such as ET-GOA can improve their performance in delivering tasks by dynamically assessing their own competency levels during execution.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Nicholas Conlon, Nisar R. Ahmed, Daniel Szafir

Accepted to the HRI 2023 workshop on Variable Autonomy for human-robot Teaming (VAT-HRI)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: As autonomous robots are deployed in increasingly complex environments, platform degradation, environmental uncertainties, and deviations from validated operation conditions can make it difficult for human partners to understand robot capabilities and limitations. The ability for a robot to self-assess its competency in dynamic and uncertain environments will be a crucial next step in successful human-robot teaming. This work presents and evaluates an Event-Triggered Generalized Outcome Assessment (ET-GOA) algorithm for autonomous agents to dynamically assess task confidence during execution. The algorithm uses a fast online statistical test of the agent's observations and its model predictions to decide when competency assessment is needed. We provide experimental results using ET-GOA to generate competency reports during a simulated delivery task and suggest future research directions for self-assessing agents.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.01646v1

The deployment of autonomous robots in complex environments presents challenges such as platform degradation, environmental uncertainties, and deviations from validated operation conditions. These factors can make it difficult for human partners to understand the capabilities and limitations of robots. To address this issue, self-assessment of robot competency in dynamic and uncertain environments is crucial for successful human-robot teaming. In this study presented at the HRI 2023 workshop on Variable Autonomy for Human-Robot Teaming, an Event-Triggered Generalized Outcome Assessment (ET-GOA) algorithm was evaluated for autonomous agents to dynamically assess task confidence during execution. The ET-GOA algorithm uses a fast online statistical test of the agent's observations and its model predictions to determine when competency assessment is necessary. The agent then selects a goal based on equation 2 and navigates directly to that goal until it either reaches the goal or triggers a re-assessment and chooses a new goal. Experimental results using ET-GOA to generate competency reports during a simulated delivery task showed significant effects of each reporting condition on deliveries in both static and dynamic environments. In the static environment, there were significant increases in deliveries with ET-GOA compared to random and with GOA compared to random. There was no difference between GOA and ET-GOA in the static environment. In contrast, in the dynamic environment, there were significant differences between all reporting conditions on deliveries. Overall, this study demonstrates that self-assessing agents using algorithms such as ET-GOA can improve their performance in delivering tasks by dynamically assessing their own competency levels during execution. Future research directions include exploring other types of statistical tests for competency assessment and investigating how these assessments can be used to improve human-robot teaming further.
Created on 14 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.