The Economic Costs of the Russia-Ukraine War: A Synthetic Control Study of (Lost) Entrepreneurship

AI-generated keywords: Russo-Ukrainian War Entrepreneurial Activity Synthetic Control Method Small Businesses Natural Experiment

AI-generated Key Points

  • The study examines the economic costs of the Russo-Ukrainian war in terms of foregone entrepreneurial activity in both countries since the invasion of Crimea in 2014.
  • The Synthetic Control Method (SCM) is used to construct counterfactuals and ensure causal identification of pre- versus post-war comparison of entrepreneurial activity in Ukraine and Russia.
  • Ukraine's number of self-employed dropped by 675,000, corresponding to a relative loss of 20%, compared to its synthetic counterfactual.
  • The percentage of self-employed decreased from 18.64% to 15.80% from the pre- to post-invasion period, with a statistically significant difference in means corresponding to 1.13 million Ukrainians being affected.
  • The number of Ukrainian SMEs temporarily dropped by 71,000 (14%) but recovered within five years after the conflict.
  • Russia had lost more than 1.4 million SMEs (42%) five years into the conflict due to fewer new businesses created and more existing business closures.
  • The average percentage of self-employed also decreased in Russia by 0.41% (0.18 million Russians), albeit statistically non-significant.
  • Conflicts have significant negative impacts on entrepreneurship, particularly for small businesses which are crucial for job creation and economic growth; therefore policymakers should prioritize measures that support entrepreneurs during times of conflict and promote peacebuilding efforts to minimize such adverse effects on entrepreneurship.
  • This study contributes to addressing a gap in existing literature on quantitative studies examining enduring conflicts over truncated sample periods or weakly identified causal effects by using a natural experiment approach with SCM methodology which provides a more robust and reliable estimate of the economic costs of the Russo-Ukrainian war on entrepreneurial activity in both countries.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: David Audretsch, Paul P. Momtaz, Hanna Motuzenko, Silvio Vismara

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: This synthetic control study quantifies the economic costs of the Russo-Ukrainian war in terms of foregone entrepreneurial activity in both countries since the invasion of Crimea in 2014. Relative to its synthetic counterfactual, Ukraine's number of self-employed dropped by 675,000, corresponding to a relative loss of 20%. The number of Ukrainian SMEs temporarily dropped by 71,000 (14%) and recovered within five years of the conflict. In contrast, Russia had lost more than 1.4 million SMEs (42%) five years into the conflict. The disappearance of Russian SMEs is driven by both fewer new businesses created and more existing business closures.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.02773v1

This study examines the economic costs of the Russo-Ukrainian war in terms of foregone entrepreneurial activity in both countries since the invasion of Crimea in 2014. The research design employs the Synthetic Control Method (SCM) to construct counterfactuals and ensure causal identification of pre- versus post-war comparison of entrepreneurial activity in Ukraine and Russia. The SCM is described as “the most important innovation in the policy evaluation literature in the last 15 years” and is the only viable quasi-experimental method for this empirical context because entrepreneurial activity levels are heterogeneous and follow non-parallel pre-trends. The study found that Ukraine's number of self-employed dropped by 675,000, corresponding to a relative loss of 20%, compared to its synthetic counterfactual. The percentage of self-employed decreased from 18.64% to 15.80% from the pre- to post-invasion period, with a statistically significant difference in means corresponding to 1.13 million Ukrainians being affected. The number of Ukrainian SMEs temporarily dropped by 71,000 (14%) but recovered within five years after the conflict. In contrast, Russia had lost more than 1.4 million SMEs (42%) five years into the conflict due to fewer new businesses created and more existing business closures. The average percentage of self-employed also decreased in Russia by 0.41% (0.18 million Russians), albeit statistically non-significant. The findings suggest that conflicts have significant negative impacts on entrepreneurship, particularly for small businesses which are crucial for job creation and economic growth; therefore policymakers should prioritize measures that support entrepreneurs during times of conflict and promote peacebuilding efforts to minimize such adverse effects on entrepreneurship. This study contributes to addressing a gap in existing literature on quantitative studies examining enduring conflicts over truncated sample periods or weakly identified causal effects by using a natural experiment approach with SCM methodology which provides a more robust and reliable estimate of the economic costs of the Russo-Ukrainian war on entrepreneurial activity in both countries.
Created on 17 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.