AI summary · arXiv: 2303.05352v1 · cs.CL
Extracting Accurate Materials Data from Research Papers with Conversational Language Models and Prompt Engineering -- Example of ChatGPT
The essentials
- Authors Maciej P. Polak and Dane Morgan discuss automating data extraction from research papers using NLP, LMs, and LLMs.
- Introduction of ChatExtract method to address challenges like initial investment in effort, expertise, and coding.
- ChatExtract leverages conversational LLMs with engineered prompts for accurate data extraction with minimal upfront effort.
- Sentences containing relevant data are identified, extracted, and verified for accuracy through follow-up questions.
- ChatExtract consistently delivers high-quality data extraction results with precision and recall rates exceeding 90% in materials data tests.
- Exceptional performance attributed to information retention capabilities of conversational models, purposeful redundancy, and introduction of uncertainty through follow-up prompts.
- Approaches like ChatExtract are expected to replace traditional methods due to simplicity, transferability, and high accuracy levels.
- Automated techniques like ChatExtract anticipated to play a significant role in streamlining data extraction processes in the future.
Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Papers around this one
See them on a mapRanked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
Evaluating ChatGPT's Information Extraction Capabilities: An Assessment of Performance, Explainability, Calibration, and FaithfulnessBo Li, Gexiang Fang, Yang Yang et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
The capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT to comprehend user intent and provide reasonable responses has made them extremely popular lately. In this paper, we focus on assessing the overall ability of ChatGPT using 7 fine-grained information extraction (IE) tasks. Specially, we present the systematically analysis by measuring ChatGPT's performance, explainability, calibration, and faithfulness, and resulting in 15 keys from either the ChatGPT or domain experts. Our findings reveal that ChatGPT's performance in Standard-IE setting is poor, but it surprisingly exhibits excellent performance in the OpenIE setting, as evidenced by human evaluation. In addition, our research ind…
-
BotChat: Evaluating LLMs' Capabilities of Having Multi-Turn DialoguesHaodong Duan, Jueqi Wei, Chonghua Wang et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
Interacting with human via high-quality multi-turn dialogues is a key feature of large language models (LLMs). However, human-based evaluation of such capability involves intensive manual labor. This report provides a preliminary evaluation of existing large language models for human-style multi-turn chatting, through an LLM-based approach. We start from real-world human dialogues and keep the very first utterances as the ChatSEED. Then we prompt LLMs to generate a full multi-turn dialogue (tens of utterances) based on the ChatSEED, utterance by utterance. Finally, we adopt state-of-the-art LLMs (GPT-4, \etc) as the judge to evaluate the generated dialogues. With different evaluation protoco…
-
Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated FeedbackBaolin Peng, Michel Galley, Pengcheng He et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks, e.g., task-oriented dialog and question answering. However, applying LLMs to real-world, mission-critical applications remains challenging mainly due to their tendency to generate hallucinations and inability to use external knowledge.This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules. Our system makes the LLM generate responses grounded in consolidated external knowledge, e.g., stored in task-specific databases. It also iteratively revises LLM prompts to improve model responses using feedback generated by util…
-
Is Information Extraction Solved by ChatGPT? An Analysis of Performance, Evaluation Criteria, Robustness and ErrorsRidong Han, Tao Peng, Chaohao Yang et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
ChatGPT has stimulated the research boom in the field of large language models. In this paper, we assess the capabilities of ChatGPT from four perspectives including Performance, Evaluation Criteria, Robustness and Error Types. Specifically, we first evaluate ChatGPT's performance on 17 datasets with 14 IE sub-tasks under the zero-shot, few-shot and chain-of-thought scenarios, and find a huge performance gap between ChatGPT and SOTA results. Next, we rethink this gap and propose a soft-matching strategy for evaluation to more accurately reflect ChatGPT's performance. Then, we analyze the robustness of ChatGPT on 14 IE sub-tasks, and find that: 1) ChatGPT rarely outputs invalid responses; 2) …
-
Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and BeyondJingfeng Yang, Hongye Jin, Ruixiang Tang et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive and practical guide for practitioners and end-users working with Large Language Models (LLMs) in their downstream natural language processing (NLP) tasks. We provide discussions and insights into the usage of LLMs from the perspectives of models, data, and downstream tasks. Firstly, we offer an introduction and brief summary of current GPT- and BERT-style LLMs. Then, we discuss the influence of pre-training data, training data, and test data. Most importantly, we provide a detailed discussion about the use and non-use cases of large language models for various natural language processing tasks, such as knowledge-intensive tasks, traditional natural languag…
-
Summary of ChatGPT-Related Research and Perspective Towards the Future of Large Language ModelsYiheng Liu, Tianle Han, Siyuan Ma et al. · 2023 · Meta-Radiology (2023)100017 · Not summarized yet
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive survey of ChatGPT-related (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) research, state-of-the-art large language models (LLM) from the GPT series, and their prospective applications across diverse domains. Indeed, key innovations such as large-scale pre-training that captures knowledge across the entire world wide web, instruction fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) have played significant roles in enhancing LLMs' adaptability and performance. We performed an in-depth analysis of 194 relevant papers on arXiv, encompassing trend analysis, word cloud representation, and distribution analysis across various application domains. The findings reveal a sign…
-
ChatGPT is not Enough: Enhancing Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Fact-aware Language ModelingLinyao Yang, Hongyang Chen, Zhao Li et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
Recently, ChatGPT, a representative large language model (LLM), has gained considerable attention due to its powerful emergent abilities. Some researchers suggest that LLMs could potentially replace structured knowledge bases like knowledge graphs (KGs) and function as parameterized knowledge bases. However, while LLMs are proficient at learning probabilistic language patterns based on large corpus and engaging in conversations with humans, they, like previous smaller pre-trained language models (PLMs), still have difficulty in recalling facts while generating knowledge-grounded contents. To overcome these limitations, researchers have proposed enhancing data-driven PLMs with knowledge-based…
-
Document-Level Machine Translation with Large Language ModelsLongyue Wang, Chenyang Lyu, Tianbo Ji et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) such as Chat-GPT can produce coherent, cohesive, relevant, and fluent answers for various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Taking document-level machine translation (MT) as a testbed, this paper provides an in-depth evaluation of LLMs' ability on discourse modeling. The study fo-cuses on three aspects: 1) Effects of Discourse-Aware Prompts, where we investigate the impact of different prompts on document-level translation quality and discourse phenomena; 2) Comparison of Translation Models, where we compare the translation performance of Chat-GPT with commercial MT systems and advanced document-level MT methods; 3) Analysis of Discourse Modelling Abilitie…
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.