Building Chatbots from Forum Data: Model Selection Using Question Answering Metrics
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper proposes a novel approach to training chatbots using question answering (QA) data from web forums.
- Pairs of question and answer sentences are extracted from longer texts in forum discussions.
- Shorter texts are used to train sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) models more efficiently.
- A new model selection strategy based on QA measures is introduced to improve parameter optimization.
- Extrinsic evaluation with respect to a QA task is suggested as an automatic evaluation method for chatbots.
- The proposed model achieves a Mean Average Precision (MAP) of 63.5% on the extrinsic task.
- The chatbot can accurately answer 49.5% of questions similar to those asked in the forum and 47.3% of more conversational questions.
- This research presents an innovative approach for training chatbots using QA data from web forums and introduces new strategies for model selection and evaluation.
Authors: Martin Boyanov, Ivan Koychev, Preslav Nakov, Alessandro Moschitti, Giovanni Da San Martino
Abstract: We propose to use question answering (QA) data from Web forums to train chatbots from scratch, i.e., without dialog training data. First, we extract pairs of question and answer sentences from the typically much longer texts of questions and answers in a forum. We then use these shorter texts to train seq2seq models in a more efficient way. We further improve the parameter optimization using a new model selection strategy based on QA measures. Finally, we propose to use extrinsic evaluation with respect to a QA task as an automatic evaluation method for chatbots. The evaluation shows that the model achieves a MAP of 63.5% on the extrinsic task. Moreover, it can answer correctly 49.5% of the questions when they are similar to questions asked in the forum, and 47.3% of the questions when they are more conversational in style.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.