ChatGPT Prompt Patterns for Improving Code Quality, Refactoring, Requirements Elicitation, and Software Design

Authors: Jules White, Sam Hays, Quchen Fu, Jesse Spencer-Smith, Douglas C. Schmidt

AI-generated keywords: ChatGPT

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper introduces prompt design techniques for software engineering using large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT.
  • The goal is to address common problems encountered when utilizing LLMs in automating software engineering tasks.
  • Tasks include ensuring code decoupling from third-party libraries and simulating a web application API before implementation.
  • The paper presents a comprehensive catalog of patterns that classify various software engineering problems they solve.
  • This catalog serves as a valuable resource for practitioners seeking effective solutions to specific challenges.
  • The paper explores several prompt patterns successfully applied in different areas of software engineering, such as requirements elicitation, rapid prototyping, code quality improvement, refactoring, and system design enhancement.
  • By employing these prompt patterns, practitioners can leverage the power of LLMs to streamline their development processes and achieve higher efficiency.
  • The authors of the paper are Jules White, Sam Hays, Quchen Fu, Jesse Spencer-Smith, and Douglas C. Schmidt.
  • Their research provides practical guidance through pattern-based approaches on how LLMs can be effectively utilized in software engineering.
  • The paper offers valuable insights into the use of LLMs like ChatGPT for automating software engineering activities.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: This paper presents prompt design techniques for software engineering, in the form of patterns, to solve common problems when using large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT to automate common software engineering activities, such as ensuring code is decoupled from third-party libraries and simulating a web application API before it is implemented. This paper provides two contributions to research on using LLMs for software engineering. First, it provides a catalog of patterns for software engineering that classifies patterns according to the types of problems they solve. Second, it explores several prompt patterns that have been applied to improve requirements elicitation, rapid prototyping, code quality, refactoring, and system design.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Mar. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.07839v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
This paper, titled "ChatGPT Prompt Patterns for Improving Code Quality, Refactoring, Requirements Elicitation, and Software Design," introduces prompt design techniques for software engineering using large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. The goal is to address common problems encountered when utilizing LLMs in automating software engineering tasks. These tasks include ensuring code decoupling from third-party libraries and simulating a web application API before implementation. The paper makes two significant contributions to the field of LLMs in software engineering. Firstly, it presents a comprehensive catalog of patterns that classify various software engineering problems they solve. This catalog serves as a valuable resource for practitioners seeking effective solutions to specific challenges. Secondly, the paper explores several prompt patterns that have been successfully applied in different areas of software engineering. These areas include requirements elicitation, rapid prototyping, code quality improvement, refactoring, and system design enhancement. By employing these prompt patterns, practitioners can leverage the power of LLMs to streamline their development processes and achieve higher efficiency. The authors of this paper are Jules White, Sam Hays, Quchen Fu, Jesse Spencer-Smith, and Douglas C. Schmidt. Their research sheds light on how LLMs can be effectively utilized in software engineering by providing practical guidance through pattern-based approaches. In conclusion, this paper offers valuable insights into the use of LLMs like ChatGPT for automating software engineering activities. It provides a comprehensive catalog of patterns and explores various prompt patterns that have proven effective in improving code quality, refactoring processes, requirements elicitation techniques, and overall software design.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.