Prompt Design and Engineering: Introduction and Advanced Methods

AI-generated keywords: Prompt Design

AI-generated Key Points

  • Prompt design and engineering are crucial for maximizing the potential of large language models (LLMs)
  • Core concepts and advanced techniques such as Chain-of-Thought and Reflection are introduced for building LLM-based agents
  • Tools are available for prompt engineers to utilize in their work
  • LLMs can be used for seeking advice and generating content based on given instructions
  • Ethical considerations regarding the use of generative AI tools must be taken into account
  • Limitations of LLMs include lack of persistent memory, probabilistic nature leading to variability in responses, reliance on pre-training data limiting real-time updates, fabrication of inaccurate information ("hallucination"), resource-intensive computational requirements affecting scalability, and domain-specificity necessitating specialized data for optimal performance
  • Advanced methods like Chain-of-Thought prompting can guide the generation of coherent text from LLMs despite limitations
  • Understanding constraints and employing innovative prompting strategies can help harness the power of LLMs while mitigating challenges
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xavier Amatriain

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Prompt design and engineering has rapidly become essential for maximizing the potential of large language models. In this paper, we introduce core concepts, advanced techniques like Chain-of-Thought and Reflection, and the principles behind building LLM-based agents. Finally, we provide a survey of tools for prompt engineers.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Jan. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.14423v4

, , , , Prompt design and engineering are crucial for maximizing the potential of large language models (LLMs). In this paper, we introduce core concepts and advanced techniques such as Chain-of-Thought and Reflection, along with principles for building LLM-based agents. Additionally, we provide a survey of tools for prompt engineers to utilize in their work. It is important to note that LLMs can not only be used for seeking advice but also for directly generating content based on given instructions. For instance, by providing personal information and specific instructions, an LLM can generate a college essay tailored to the input data. While this showcases the impressive capabilities of LLMs, it is essential to consider ethical considerations regarding the use of generative AI tools. Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that LLMs have inherent limitations that can impact their application and effectiveness. These limitations include a lack of persistent memory or state, probabilistic nature leading to variability in responses, reliance on pre-training data limiting real-time updates, potential fabrication of inaccurate information (referred to as "hallucination"), resource-intensive computational requirements affecting scalability, and domain-specificity necessitating specialized data for optimal performance. However, advanced methods like Chain-of-Thought prompting exemplify how prompts can guide the generation of coherent text from LLMs despite these limitations. By understanding these constraints and employing innovative prompting strategies, researchers and engineers can harness the power of LLMs while mitigating potential challenges. In conclusion, plays a pivotal role in leveraging the capabilities of large language models effectively. By exploring advanced techniques and acknowledging the limitations of LLMs, professionals can optimize the performance of these models for various applications while being mindful of surrounding their use.
Created on 13 Sep. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.