Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.08896v1

Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3 have shown impressive capabilities in generating highly fluent and realistic responses to a wide range of user prompts. However, one major concern with LLMs is their tendency to hallucinate facts and make non-factual statements, which can undermine trust in their output. Existing fact-checking approaches either require access to token-level output probability distribution or external databases interfaced via separate modules, which may not always be available or feasible. To address this issue, researchers have proposed "SelfCheckGPT," a simple sampling-based approach that can be used to fact-check black-box models in a zero-resource fashion without an external database. The approach leverages the idea that if an LLM has knowledge of a given concept, sampled responses are likely to contain consistent facts. In contrast, for hallucinated facts, stochastically sampled responses are likely to diverge and contradict each other. The researchers investigated the effectiveness of SelfCheckGPT by using GPT-3 to generate passages about individuals from the WikiBio dataset and manually annotating the factuality of the generated passages. They demonstrated that SelfCheckGPT can detect both factual and non-factual sentences and rank passages in terms of factuality. Comparing their approach with several existing baselines, they found that SelfCheckGPT outperformed them in passage factuality assessment while having AUC-PR scores comparable to grey-box methods in sentence hallucination detection. While uncertainty metrics such as token probability and perplexity can also be used for hallucination detection, they require access to full output token-level probability distribution information that may not always be available. Moreover, current uncertainty metrics only assess uncertainty relative to the model's training data rather than assessing whether generated outputs align with factual information outside the model's training data. Overall, SelfCheckGPT offers a promising solution for detecting hallucinations in LLM-generated texts without relying on external databases or token-level probability distributions. By providing a simple and effective approach for fact-checking, SelfCheckGPT can help improve the trustworthiness of LLM-generated texts in various applications, including automatic report drafting, virtual assistants, and summarization systems.

• - Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3 can generate highly fluent and realistic responses to a wide range of user prompts.
• - However, LLMs have a tendency to hallucinate facts and make non-factual statements, which can undermine trust in their output.
• - Existing fact-checking approaches require access to token-level output probability distribution or external databases interfaced via separate modules, which may not always be available or feasible.
• - "SelfCheckGPT" is a simple sampling-based approach that can be used to fact-check black-box models in a zero-resource fashion without an external database.
• - The approach leverages the idea that if an LLM has knowledge of a given concept, sampled responses are likely to contain consistent facts. In contrast, for hallucinated facts, stochastically sampled responses are likely to diverge and contradict each other.
• - SelfCheckGPT can detect both factual and non-factual sentences and rank passages in terms of factuality.
• - Comparing with several existing baselines, SelfCheckGPT outperformed them in passage factuality assessment while having AUC-PR scores comparable to grey-box methods in sentence hallucination detection.
• - SelfCheckGPT offers a promising solution for detecting hallucinations in LLM-generated texts without relying on external databases or token-level probability distributions.
• - By providing a simple and effective approach for fact-checking, SelfCheckGPT can help improve the trustworthiness of LLM-generated texts in various applications including automatic report drafting, virtual assistants, and summarization systems.

There are computer programs called Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) that can talk like humans and answer questions. Sometimes these programs make mistakes and say things that aren't true, which can be a problem. People have made ways to check if the things the program says are true or not, but sometimes those ways don't work. A new way called "SelfCheckGPT" helps check if the program is saying true things by looking at how consistent its answers are. This new way is better than other ways people have tried before. It's important to make sure these programs are telling the truth so we can trust them when we use them. Definitions- Generative Large Language Models (LLMs): Computer programs that can talk like humans and answer questions. - Fact-checking: Checking if something is true or not. - Hallucinate: When something isn't real but seems real. - Factual: Something that is true. - Sampling-based approach: A way of checking something by looking at a small part of it instead of everything all at once. - Zero-resource fashion: A way of checking something without needing extra help from other sources or databases. - Baselines: Other methods used for comparison in experiments - AUC-PR scores: a measure of performance in machine learning models

Fact-Checking Generative Language Models with SelfCheckGPT

Generative language models (LLMs) such as GPT-3 have shown impressive capabilities in generating highly fluent and realistic responses to a wide range of user prompts. However, one major concern with LLMs is their tendency to hallucinate facts and make non-factual statements, which can undermine trust in their output. To address this issue, researchers have proposed "SelfCheckGPT," a simple sampling-based approach that can be used to fact-check black-box models in a zero-resource fashion without an external database.

Background on Fact Checking

Existing fact-checking approaches either require access to token-level output probability distribution or external databases interfaced via separate modules, which may not always be available or feasible. The idea behind SelfCheckGPT is that if an LLM has knowledge of a given concept, sampled responses are likely to contain consistent facts. In contrast, for hallucinated facts, stochastically sampled responses are likely to diverge and contradict each other.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of SelfCheckGPT

The researchers investigated the effectiveness of SelfCheckGPT by using GPT-3 to generate passages about individuals from the WikiBio dataset and manually annotating the factuality of the generated passages. They demonstrated that SelfCheckGPT can detect both factual and non-factual sentences and rank passages in terms of factuality. Comparing their approach with several existing baselines, they found that SelfCheckGPT outperformed them in passage factuality assessment while having AUC-PR scores comparable to grey-box methods in sentence hallucination detection.

Advantages Over Existing Methods

While uncertainty metrics such as token probability and perplexity can also be used for hallucination detection, they require access to full output token level probability distribution information that may not always be available. Moreover, current uncertainty metrics only assess uncertainty relative to the model's training data rather than assessing whether generated outputs align with factual information outside the model's training data. Overall, SelfCheckGPT offers a promising solution for detecting hallucinations in LLM generated texts without relying on external databases or token level probability distributions.

Conclusion

By providing a simple and effective approach for fact checking ,Self Check Gpt can help improve the trustworthiness of LLM generated texts in various applications including automatic report drafting , virtual assistants ,and summarization systems .