Optimal liquidation with temporary and permanent price impact, an application to cryptocurrencies

AI-generated keywords: Liquidation Cryptocurrency Optimal Trading Price Impact Numerical Techniques

AI-generated Key Points

  • Paper focuses on optimal liquidation of stocks in the context of cryptocurrencies
  • Analytical solutions presented for linear temporary impact and both linear and quadratic permanent impact
  • Numerical methods used for more general models, such as finite differences and optimal policy iteration
  • Alternative scheme called implicit directional scheme proposed to improve convergence in multi-dimensional finite differences
  • Functional forms of temporary and permanent price impacts calibrated using data from BNB cryptocurrency order book
  • Calibrated parameters change based on depth in ticks and volumes of limit order book (LOB)
  • Three scenarios identified: underestimation, overestimation, and average estimation, each corresponding to different functional forms for impacts
  • Power form observed for smaller inventories to be liquidated (impact increases as target is reached)
  • Power form observed for larger inventories relative to LOB settings (impact decreases as liquidation progresses)
  • Linear form observed in between these two scenarios (a = 1) for both impacts
  • Optimal trading policies determined based on calibrated functional forms, with low trading rate initially increasing over time generating higher revenue compared to naive strategies
  • Liquidation trajectories simulated based on optimal policies and compared against different parametrizations
  • Insights provided into optimizing stock liquidation in cryptocurrency markets by considering both temporary and permanent price impacts
  • Importance of numerical techniques highlighted due to limited availability of analytical solutions for complex scenarios
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hugo E. Ramirez, Julián Fernando Sanchez

arXiv: 2303.10043v1 - DOI (q-fin.TR)
20 pages, 20 figures, 3 tables
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: This paper studies the optimal liquidation of stocks in the presence of temporary and permanent price impacts, and we focus in the case of cryptocurrencies. We start by presenting analytical solutions to the problem with linear temporary impact, and linear and quadratic permanent impact. Then, using data from the order book of the BNB cryptocurrency, we estimate the functional form of the temporary and permanent price impact in three different scenarios: underestimation, overestimation and average estimation, finding different functional forms for each scenario. Using finite differences and optimal policy iteration, we solve the problem numerically and observe interesting changes in the optimal liquidation policy when applying calibrated linear and power forms for the temporary and permanent price impacts. Then, with these optimal policies, we identify optimal liquidation trajectories and simulate the liquidation of initial inventories to compare the performance among the optimal strategies under different parametrizations and against a naive strategy. Finally, we characterize the optimal policies based on the functional form of the inventory and find that policies generating the highest revenue are those starting with a low trading rate and increasing it as time passes.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.10043v1

This paper focuses on studying the optimal liquidation of stocks, specifically in the context of cryptocurrencies. The authors begin by presenting analytical solutions for the problem with linear temporary impact and both linear and quadratic permanent impact. However, since analytical solutions are limited, they employ numerical methods such as finite differences and optimal policy iteration to solve the problem for more general models. To improve convergence in the multi-dimensional finite differences, the authors propose using an alternative scheme called implicit directional scheme. They also calibrate the functional forms of the temporary and permanent price impacts using data from the order book of the BNB cryptocurrency. Interestingly, they find that calibrated parameters for these impacts change according to the depth in ticks and volumes of the limit order book (LOB). The authors identify three different scenarios based on their calibration results: underestimation, overestimation, and average estimation. Each scenario corresponds to a different functional form for both temporary and permanent price impacts. For smaller inventories to be liquidated, they observe a power form where impact increases as the liquidation target is reached (a > 1). Conversely, for larger inventories relative to LOB settings, they find a power form where impact decreases as liquidation progresses (0 < a < 1). In between these two scenarios, they observe a linear form (a = 1) for both impacts. Using these calibrated functional forms, the authors determine optimal trading policies for each scenario. They find that policies starting with a low trading rate and gradually increasing it over time generate higher revenue compared to naive strategies. Finally, they simulate liquidation trajectories based on these optimal policies and compare their performance against different parametrizations. In conclusion, this paper provides insights into optimizing stock liquidation in cryptocurrency markets by considering both temporary and permanent price impacts. The authors highlight the importance of using numerical techniques due to limited availability of analytical solutions for more complex scenarios. Their findings contribute to understanding optimal trading strategies based on the functional form of inventory and can be valuable for market participants in maximizing revenue during liquidation processes.
Created on 23 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.