Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.02179v1

This paper presents a practical algorithm for fair transaction ordering that takes into account both transaction timestamps and bids. The algorithm ensures that users get their transactions published with bounded delay against a bid, while extracting a fair value from sophisticated users who have an edge in latency by moving expenditure from investment in latency improvement technology to bidding. The algorithm creates a score from timestamps and bids and orders transactions based on the score. The authors first demonstrate that a scoring rule is the only type of rule that satisfies the independence of latency races. They provide an economic analysis of the protocol in an environment of private information, where investment in latency is made ex-ante or interim stages, while bidding happens at the interim stage where private signals have been observed. Fair transaction ordering has recently attracted a lot of attention, with several studies focusing on how to aggregate the order of transactions seen by multiple different parties/sequencers fairly and efficiently. This paper's approach is closest to previous works interested in an asynchronous network setting. The implementation version of these protocols can be found elsewhere, including improved asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) implementations and more recent reviews of literature. Latency reduction techniques for players in decentralized systems are also discussed. Overall, this algorithm is useful for transaction sequencing in rollups or other environments where the sequencer has privileged access to order flows. The authors hope that this work will contribute to creating more efficient and fairer markets where all participants can benefit if they apply policies honestly.

• - The paper presents a practical algorithm for fair transaction ordering that considers both transaction timestamps and bids.
• - The algorithm ensures that users get their transactions published with bounded delay against a bid while extracting a fair value from sophisticated users who have an edge in latency.
• - The algorithm creates a score from timestamps and bids and orders transactions based on the score.
• - A scoring rule is the only type of rule that satisfies the independence of latency races.
• - An economic analysis of the protocol is provided in an environment of private information, where investment in latency is made ex-ante or interim stages, while bidding happens at the interim stage where private signals have been observed.
• - This approach is closest to previous works interested in an asynchronous network setting.
• - Latency reduction techniques for players in decentralized systems are also discussed.
• - This algorithm is useful for transaction sequencing in rollups or other environments where the sequencer has privileged access to order flows.

There is a way to make sure people's transactions get processed fairly and quickly. This way looks at the time the transaction was made and how much someone is willing to pay for it. The algorithm that does this makes sure everyone gets a fair deal, even if some people have an advantage with faster internet. It uses something called a "scoring rule" to decide which transactions should go first. People who invest in faster internet before making their transaction can also use this algorithm to make sure they get a fair deal. This algorithm can be used in different situations where someone has special access to process transactions.

Fair Transaction Ordering with Timestamps and Bids

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in fair transaction ordering for decentralized systems. This paper presents an algorithm that takes into account both transaction timestamps and bids to ensure users get their transactions published with bounded delay against a bid, while extracting a fair value from sophisticated users who have an edge in latency.

The Algorithm

The algorithm creates a score from timestamps and bids and orders transactions based on the score. The authors first demonstrate that a scoring rule is the only type of rule that satisfies the independence of latency races. They provide an economic analysis of the protocol in an environment of private information, where investment in latency is made ex-ante or interim stages, while bidding happens at the interim stage where private signals have been observed.

Implementation Version

The implementation version of this protocol can be found elsewhere, including improved asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) implementations and more recent reviews of literature. Latency reduction techniques for players in decentralized systems are also discussed. Overall, this algorithm is useful for transaction sequencing in rollups or other environments where the sequencer has privileged access to order flows.

Conclusion

The authors hope that this work will contribute to creating more efficient and fairer markets where all participants can benefit if they apply policies honestly. Fair transaction ordering has recently attracted a lot of attention, with several studies focusing on how to aggregate the order of transactions seen by multiple different parties/sequencers fairly and efficiently; this paper's approach is closest to previous works interested in an asynchronous network setting