Lithium, masses, and kinematics of young Galactic dwarf and giant stars with extreme [α/Fe] ratios
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Recent spectroscopic studies have found red giants with high [{\alpha}/Fe] ratios despite their young ages.
- The authors of this study revisit the GALAH DR3 survey to identify dwarf and giant stars with extreme [{\alpha}/Fe] ratios in the upper 1% range.
- These outliers are called ex{\alpha}fe stars, and their properties (chemical abundances, masses, ages, and kinematics) are investigated using data from GALAH DR3 and a Value-Added Catalogue.
- The authors explore the effects of secular stellar evolution and magnitude limitations of the GALAH survey on the mass and metallicity distributions of sample stars.
- Both dwarf and giant ex{\alpha}fe stars younger than 3 Gyr are found, which exhibit lithium abundances similar to those of young [{\alpha}/Fe]-normal dwarfs at the same age and [Fe/H].
- Both dwarf and giant y-ex{\alpha}fe stars' [Fe/H] and mass distributions do not differ from those found in thin disk counterparts with normal [{\alpha}/Fe], sharing similar kinematic properties.
- The authors conclude that y-exαfe dwarf and giant stars are indeed young, with no peculiarity in their mass distribution but differing from young [α/Fe]-normal stars only by their extreme α content.
- However, the origin of these y-exαfe stars remains unclear.
Authors: S. Borisov, N. Prantzos, C. Charbonnel
Abstract: Recent spectroscopic explorations of large Galactic stellar samples stars have revealed the existence of red giants with [{\alpha}/Fe] ratios anomalously high given their relatively young ages. We revisit the GALAH DR3 survey to look for both dwarf and giant stars with extreme [{\alpha}/Fe] ratios, i.e., upper 1% in the [{\alpha}/Fe]-[Fe/H] plane over the range in [Fe/H] between -1.1 and +0.4 dex. We call these outliers ex{\alpha}fe stars. We use the GALAH DR3 data along with their Value-Added Catalogue to trace the properties (chemical abundances, masses, ages, and kinematics) of the ex{\alpha}fe. We investigate the effects of secular stellar evolution and of the magnitude limitations of the GALAH survey to understand the mass and metallicity distributions of the sample stars and discuss the corresponding biases in previous studies of stars with high - though not extreme - [{\alpha}/Fe] in other spectroscopic surveys. We find both dwarf and giant ex{\alpha}fe stars younger than 3 Gyr, that we call y-ex{\alpha}fe. Dwarf y-ex{\alpha}fe stars exhibit lithium abundances similar to those of young [{\alpha}/Fe]-normal dwarfs at the same age and [Fe/H]. In particular, the youngest and most massive stars of both populations exhibit the highest Li abundances, A(Li){\sim}3.5 dex, while cooler and/or older stars exhibit the same Li depletion patterns increasing with both decreasing mass and increasing age. In addition, the [Fe/H] and mass distributions of both the dwarf and giant y-ex{\alpha}fe stars do not differ from those of their [{\alpha}/Fe]-normal counterparts found in the thin disk, and they share the same kinematic properties. We conclude that y-ex{\alpha}fe dwarf and giant stars are indeed young, that their mass distribution shows no peculiarity, and that they differ from young [{\alpha}/Fe]-normal stars by their extreme [{\alpha}/Fe] content only. However, their origin remains unclear.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.