AI summary · arXiv: 2303.15265v1 · cs.CL
Bilex Rx: Lexical Data Augmentation for Massively Multilingual Machine Translation
The essentials
- Neural machine translation (NMT) has made significant progress, especially with the development of Unsupervised Machine Translation (UNMT)
- UNMT allows for high-quality translation using only monolingual text data
- NMT models struggle with accurately translating common nouns
- Bilingual lexica can be used to address this issue
- Experiments on 200-language translation models showed that augmenting lexical data led to substantial performance improvements in unsupervised translation
- Different families of data augmentation techniques yielded similar improvements and could be combined for greater gains
- Carefully curated lexica were found to be more important than larger but noisier ones, especially when used with larger models
- Multilingual lexicon data was compared to human-translated parallel data, and its efficacy was evaluated
- GATITOS, a new multilingual lexicon for 26 low-resource languages, outperformed other lexica in the experiments and is open-source
- Examples of mistakes commonly made by NMT models were discussed, along with how bilingual lexicon entries can help mitigate these errors
- Details about the datasets used in the experiments, including monolingual and parallel data sources, were provided
- Augmenting training data with bilingual lexicon information significantly improves machine translation performance for low-resource and unsupervised languages
- The GATITOS dataset achieved average gains of around +8 CHRF on unsupervised languages
- Future research may focus on leveraging bilingual lexica to prompt foundation models, particularly for low-resource languages
Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Papers around this one
See them on a mapRanked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
LLM-powered Data Augmentation for Enhanced Crosslingual PerformanceChenxi Whitehouse, Monojit Choudhury, Alham Fikri Aji · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
This paper aims to explore the potential of leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for data augmentation in crosslingual commonsense reasoning datasets, where the available training data is extremely limited. To achieve this, we employ several LLMs including Dolly-v2, StableVicuna, ChatGPT, and GPT-4 to augment three datasets: XCOPA, XWinograd, and XStoryCloze. Subsequently, we assess the effectiveness of fine-tuning smaller crosslingual models, mBERT and XLMR, using the synthesised data. We compare the performance of training with data generated in English and target languages, as well as translating the English-generated data into the target languages. Our experiments reveal the overall a…
-
Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at ScaleAlexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal et al. · 2019 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
This paper shows that pretraining multilingual language models at scale leads to significant performance gains for a wide range of cross-lingual transfer tasks. We train a Transformer-based masked language model on one hundred languages, using more than two terabytes of filtered CommonCrawl data. Our model, dubbed XLM-R, significantly outperforms multilingual BERT (mBERT) on a variety of cross-lingual benchmarks, including +13.8% average accuracy on XNLI, +12.3% average F1 score on MLQA, and +2.1% average F1 score on NER. XLM-R performs particularly well on low-resource languages, improving 11.8% in XNLI accuracy for Swahili and 9.2% for Urdu over the previous XLM model. We also present a de…
-
(Perhaps) Beyond Human Translation: Harnessing Multi-Agent Collaboration for Translating Ultra-Long Literary TextsMinghao Wu, Yulin Yuan, Gholamreza Haffari et al. · 2024 · Computation and Language · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Recent advancements in machine translation (MT) have significantly enhanced translation quality across various domains. However, the translation of literary texts remains a formidable challenge due to their complex language, figurative expressions, and cultural nuances. In this work, we introduce a novel multi-agent framework based on large language models (LLMs) for literary translation, implemented as a company called TransAgents, which mirrors traditional translation publication process by leveraging the collective capabilities of multiple agents, to address the intricate demands of translating literary works. To evaluate the effectiveness of our system, we propose two innovative evaluati…
-
Cross-lingual Language Model PretrainingGuillaume Lample, Alexis Conneau · 2019 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated the efficiency of generative pretraining for English natural language understanding. In this work, we extend this approach to multiple languages and show the effectiveness of cross-lingual pretraining. We propose two methods to learn cross-lingual language models (XLMs): one unsupervised that only relies on monolingual data, and one supervised that leverages parallel data with a new cross-lingual language model objective. We obtain state-of-the-art results on cross-lingual classification, unsupervised and supervised machine translation. On XNLI, our approach pushes the state of the art by an absolute gain of 4.9% accuracy. On unsupervised machine translation,…
-
Salute the Classic: Revisiting Challenges of Machine Translation in the Age of Large Language ModelsJianhui Pang, Fanghua Ye, Longyue Wang et al. · 2024 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
The evolution of Neural Machine Translation (NMT) has been significantly influenced by six core challenges (Koehn and Knowles, 2017), which have acted as benchmarks for progress in this field. This study revisits these challenges, offering insights into their ongoing relevance in the context of advanced Large Language Models (LLMs): domain mismatch, amount of parallel data, rare word prediction, translation of long sentences, attention model as word alignment, and sub-optimal beam search. Our empirical findings indicate that LLMs effectively lessen the reliance on parallel data for major languages in the pretraining phase. Additionally, the LLM-based translation system significantly enhances…
-
Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and AnalysisWenhao Zhu, Hongyi Liu, Qingxiu Dong et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in handling multilingual machine translation (MMT). In this paper, we systematically investigate the advantages and challenges of LLMs for MMT by answering two questions: 1) How well do LLMs perform in translating a massive number of languages? 2) Which factors affect LLMs' performance in translation? We evaluate popular LLMs, including XGLM, OPT, BLOOMZ, and ChatGPT, on 102 languages. Our empirical results show that even the best model ChatGPT still lags behind the supervised baseline NLLB in 83.33% of translation directions. Through further analysis, we discover that LLMs exhibit new working patterns when used for MMT. Fir…
-
Balancing Training for Multilingual Neural Machine TranslationXinyi Wang, Yulia Tsvetkov, Graham Neubig · 2020 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
When training multilingual machine translation (MT) models that can translate to/from multiple languages, we are faced with imbalanced training sets: some languages have much more training data than others. Standard practice is to up-sample less resourced languages to increase representation, and the degree of up-sampling has a large effect on the overall performance. In this paper, we propose a method that instead automatically learns how to weight training data through a data scorer that is optimized to maximize performance on all test languages. Experiments on two sets of languages under both one-to-many and many-to-one MT settings show our method not only consistently outperforms heurist…
-
A Paradigm Shift in Machine Translation: Boosting Translation Performance of Large Language ModelsHaoran Xu, Young Jin Kim, Amr Sharaf et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
Abstract
Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in various NLP tasks. However, these advances have not been reflected in the translation task, especially those with moderate model sizes (i.e., 7B or 13B parameters), which still lag behind conventional supervised encoder-decoder translation models. Previous studies have attempted to improve the translation capabilities of these moderate LLMs, but their gains have been limited. In this study, we propose a novel fine-tuning approach for LLMs that is specifically designed for the translation task, eliminating the need for the abundant parallel data that traditional translation models usually depend on. Our approach …
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.