AI summary · arXiv: 2305.14288v1 · cs.CL

LLM-powered Data Augmentation for Enhanced Crosslingual Performance

Chenxi Whitehouse, Monojit Choudhury, Alham Fikri Aji
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 23 May. 2023 License: CC BY 4.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • The paper addresses the challenge of data scarcity in crosslingual commonsense reasoning datasets.
  • Large Language Models (LLMs) are explored for data augmentation, including Dolly-v2, StableVicuna, ChatGPT, and GPT-4.
  • Three low-resource datasets are augmented: XCOPA, XWinograd, and XStoryCloze.
  • Fine-tuning smaller crosslingual models mBERT and XLMR using synthesised data is assessed for effectiveness.
  • Incorporating data generated by LLMs consistently improves performance compared to baseline models.
  • GPT-4 generates the best synthetic data compared to other models such as ChatGPT and Dolly-v2.
  • LLMs like ChatGPT and GPT-4 excel at generating natural text in most languages except Tamil.
  • Multilingual scaling through fine-tuning smaller models using synthetic data is showcased practically.
  • The study provides an extensive analysis of various target languages' effects on model performance.
  • Synthesised datasets are released for public use and reproducibility.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Data Augmentation

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This paper addresses the challenge of data scarcity in crosslingual commonsense reasoning datasets by exploring the potential of leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for data augmentation. The authors employ several LLMs, including Dolly-v2, StableVicuna, ChatGPT, and GPT-4 to augment three low-resource datasets: XCOPA, XWinograd, and XStoryCloze. They then assess the effectiveness of fine-tuning smaller crosslingual models, mBERT and XLMR, using the synthesised data. The study compares the performance of training with data generated in English and target languages as well as translating English-generated data into target languages. The experiments reveal that incorporating data generated by LLMs consistently improves performance compared to baseline models. Training on synthetic data generated by GPT-4 improves performance consistently compared to other models such as ChatGPT and Dolly-v2. The authors also conduct a human evaluation of the naturalness and logical coherence of the generated examples for different languages. The results show that LLMs like ChatGPT and GPT-4 excel at generating natural text in most languages except Tamil. Moreover, ChatGPT trails behind in generating plausible alternatives compared to the original dataset while GPT-4 demonstrates competitive logic consistency in synthesised data. In addition to augmenting low-resource datasets using LLMs, this work contributes to expanding NLP beyond English by showcasing practical value in multilingual scaling through fine-tuning smaller models using synthetic data. The study also provides an extensive analysis of various target languages' effects on model performance and releases synthesised datasets for public use and reproducibility. Previous studies have shown that zero-shot cross-lingual transfer can be effective when dealing with limited resources; however, this study shows that employing LLMs for data augmentation can improve model performance significantly. Multilingual Data Augmentation has been explored previously; however, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the effects of various target languages on model performance. Overall, this paper's contributions include augmenting low-resource datasets using LLMs, showcasing practical value in multilingual scaling through fine-tuning smaller models using synthetic data, and providing an extensive analysis of the effects of various target languages on model performance. The authors release synthesised datasets for public use and reproducibility.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Very close
    LLM2LLM: Boosting LLMs with Novel Iterative Data Enhancement
    Nicholas Lee, Thanakul Wattanawong, Sehoon Kim et al. · 2024 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Pretrained large language models (LLMs) are currently state-of-the-art for solving the vast majority of natural language processing tasks. While many real-world applications still require fine-tuning to reach satisfactory levels of performance, many of them are in the low-data regime, making fine-tuning challenging. To address this, we propose LLM2LLM, a targeted and iterative data augmentation strategy that uses a teacher LLM to enhance a small seed dataset by augmenting additional data that can be used for fine-tuning on a specific task. LLM2LLM (1) fine-tunes a baseline student LLM on the initial seed data, (2) evaluates and extracts data points that the model gets wrong, and (3) uses a t…

  2. Very close
    Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Summarization via Large Language Models
    Jiaan Wang, Yunlong Liang, Fandong Meng et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Given a document in a source language, cross-lingual summarization (CLS) aims to generate a summary in a different target language. Recently, the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-3.5, ChatGPT and GPT-4, has attracted wide attention from the computational linguistics community. However, it is not yet known the performance of LLMs on CLS. In this report, we empirically use various prompts to guide LLMs to perform zero-shot CLS from different paradigms (i.e., end-to-end and pipeline), and provide a preliminary evaluation on the generated summaries. We find that ChatGPT and GPT-4 originally prefer to produce lengthy summaries with detailed information. These two LLMs can fu…

  3. Very close
    Cross-lingual Language Model Pretraining
    Guillaume Lample, Alexis Conneau · 2019 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Recent studies have demonstrated the efficiency of generative pretraining for English natural language understanding. In this work, we extend this approach to multiple languages and show the effectiveness of cross-lingual pretraining. We propose two methods to learn cross-lingual language models (XLMs): one unsupervised that only relies on monolingual data, and one supervised that leverages parallel data with a new cross-lingual language model objective. We obtain state-of-the-art results on cross-lingual classification, unsupervised and supervised machine translation. On XNLI, our approach pushes the state of the art by an absolute gain of 4.9% accuracy. On unsupervised machine translation,…

  4. Very close
    PolyLM: An Open Source Polyglot Large Language Model
    Xiangpeng Wei, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable ability to comprehend, reason, and generate following nature language instructions. However, the development of LLMs has been primarily focused on high-resource languages, such as English, thereby limiting their applicability and research in other languages. Consequently, we present PolyLM, a multilingual LLM trained on 640 billion (B) tokens, avaliable in two model sizes: 1.7B and 13B. To enhance its multilingual capabilities, we 1) integrate bilingual data into training data; and 2) adopt a curriculum learning strategy that increases the proportion of non-English data from 30% in the first stage to 60% in the final stage during pre-traini…

  5. Very close
    Better to Ask in English: Evaluation of Large Language Models on English, Low-resource and Cross-Lingual Settings
    Krishno Dey, Prerona Tarannum, Md. Arid Hasan et al. · 2024 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained on massive amounts of data, enabling their application across diverse domains and tasks. Despite their remarkable performance, most LLMs are developed and evaluated primarily in English. Recently, a few multi-lingual LLMs have emerged, but their performance in low-resource languages, especially the most spoken languages in South Asia, is less explored. To address this gap, in this study, we evaluate LLMs such as GPT-4, Llama 2, and Gemini to analyze their effectiveness in English compared to other low-resource languages from South Asia (e.g., Bangla, Hindi, and Urdu). Specifically, we utilized zero-shot prompting and five different prompt settings to …

  6. Very close
    Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale
    Alexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal et al. · 2019 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    This paper shows that pretraining multilingual language models at scale leads to significant performance gains for a wide range of cross-lingual transfer tasks. We train a Transformer-based masked language model on one hundred languages, using more than two terabytes of filtered CommonCrawl data. Our model, dubbed XLM-R, significantly outperforms multilingual BERT (mBERT) on a variety of cross-lingual benchmarks, including +13.8% average accuracy on XNLI, +12.3% average F1 score on MLQA, and +2.1% average F1 score on NER. XLM-R performs particularly well on low-resource languages, improving 11.8% in XNLI accuracy for Swahili and 9.2% for Urdu over the previous XLM model. We also present a de…

  7. Very close
    Augmented Language Models: a Survey
    Grégoire Mialon, Roberto Dessì, Maria Lomeli et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    This survey reviews works in which language models (LMs) are augmented with reasoning skills and the ability to use tools. The former is defined as decomposing a potentially complex task into simpler subtasks while the latter consists in calling external modules such as a code interpreter. LMs can leverage these augmentations separately or in combination via heuristics, or learn to do so from demonstrations. While adhering to a standard missing tokens prediction objective, such augmented LMs can use various, possibly non-parametric external modules to expand their context processing ability, thus departing from the pure language modeling paradigm. We therefore refer to them as Augmented Lang…

  8. Very close
    Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback
    Baolin Peng, Michel Galley, Pengcheng He et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks, e.g., task-oriented dialog and question answering. However, applying LLMs to real-world, mission-critical applications remains challenging mainly due to their tendency to generate hallucinations and inability to use external knowledge.This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules. Our system makes the LLM generate responses grounded in consolidated external knowledge, e.g., stored in task-specific databases. It also iteratively revises LLM prompts to improve model responses using feedback generated by util…

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.