LLM-powered Data Augmentation for Enhanced Crosslingual Performance
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper addresses the challenge of data scarcity in crosslingual commonsense reasoning datasets.
- Large Language Models (LLMs) are explored for data augmentation, including Dolly-v2, StableVicuna, ChatGPT, and GPT-4.
- Three low-resource datasets are augmented: XCOPA, XWinograd, and XStoryCloze.
- Fine-tuning smaller crosslingual models mBERT and XLMR using synthesised data is assessed for effectiveness.
- Incorporating data generated by LLMs consistently improves performance compared to baseline models.
- GPT-4 generates the best synthetic data compared to other models such as ChatGPT and Dolly-v2.
- LLMs like ChatGPT and GPT-4 excel at generating natural text in most languages except Tamil.
- Multilingual scaling through fine-tuning smaller models using synthetic data is showcased practically.
- The study provides an extensive analysis of various target languages' effects on model performance.
- Synthesised datasets are released for public use and reproducibility.
Authors: Chenxi Whitehouse, Monojit Choudhury, Alham Fikri Aji
Abstract: This paper aims to explore the potential of leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for data augmentation in crosslingual commonsense reasoning datasets, where the available training data is extremely limited. To achieve this, we employ several LLMs including Dolly-v2, StableVicuna, ChatGPT, and GPT-4 to augment three datasets: XCOPA, XWinograd, and XStoryCloze. Subsequently, we assess the effectiveness of fine-tuning smaller crosslingual models, mBERT and XLMR, using the synthesised data. We compare the performance of training with data generated in English and target languages, as well as translating the English-generated data into the target languages. Our experiments reveal the overall advantages of incorporating data generated by LLMs. Training on synthetic data generated by GPT-4, whether English or multilingual, improves performance consistently compared to the baseline. Other models also exhibit an overall increase in performance, however, their effectiveness decreases in some settings. We also ask native speakers to evaluate the naturalness and logical soundness of the generated examples for different languages. Human evaluation reveals that LLMs like ChatGPT and GPT-4 excel at generating natural text in most languages, except a few such as Tamil. Moreover, ChatGPT trails behind in generating plausible alternatives in comparison to the original dataset, while GPT-4 demonstrates competitive logic consistency in the synthesised data.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.