Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.16771v1

The Solar Orbiter spacecraft (SO) and the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) both use polarised light images to infer the photospheric magnetic field. The High Resolution Telescope (HRT) of the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager on board SO and the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board SDO are two instruments that provide magnetic field maps. SO/PHI is the first magnetograph to move out of the Sun-Earth line, providing unprecedented access to the Sun's poles. This presents an excellent opportunity for new research where both instruments' magnetic field maps can be used simultaneously. In a recent study, researchers aimed to compare the magnetic field maps from these two instruments and discuss any possible differences between them. They used data obtained during Solar Orbiter's inferior conjunction on 7 March 2022. The HRT data were additionally treated for geometric distortion and degraded to the same resolution as HMI, while HMI data were re-projected to correct for the $3^{\circ}$ separation between the two observatories. The comparison showed that SO/PHI-HRT and HMI produce remarkably similar line-of-sight magnetograms, with a slope coefficient of $0.97$, an offset below $1$ G, and a Pearson correlation coefficient of $0.97$. However, SO/PHI-HRT infers weaker line-of-sight fields for the strongest fields. As for vector magnetic fields, SO/PHI-HRT was compared to both the $720$-second and $90$-second HMI vector magnetic field: SO/PHI-HRT has a closer alignment with the $90$-second HMI vector. In weak signal regimes ($< 600$ G), SO/PHI-HRT measures stronger and more horizontal fields than HMI due to greater noise in its data. In strong field regimes ($\gtrsim 600$ G), HRT infers lower field strengths but with similar inclinations (a slope of $0.92$) and azimuths (a slope of $1.02$). The slope values are from the comparison with the HMI $90$-second vector. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into similarities and differences between magnetic field maps obtained by SO/PHI-HRT and SDO/HMI instruments which highlights their importance in gaining a more comprehensive understanding of the Sun's magnetic field when used simultaneously.

• - Solar Orbiter spacecraft (SO) and the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) both use polarised light images to infer the photospheric magnetic field.
• - The High Resolution Telescope (HRT) of the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager on board SO and the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board SDO are two instruments that provide magnetic field maps.
• - SO/PHI is the first magnetograph to move out of the Sun-Earth line, providing unprecedented access to the Sun's poles.
• - Researchers aimed to compare magnetic field maps from these two instruments using data obtained during Solar Orbiter's inferior conjunction on 7 March 2022.
• - Comparison showed that SO/PHI-HRT and HMI produce remarkably similar line-of-sight magnetograms with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.97.
• - In weak signal regimes (< 600 G), SO/PHI-HRT measures stronger and more horizontal fields than HMI due to greater noise in its data.
• - In strong field regimes (> 600 G), HRT infers lower field strengths but with similar inclinations (a slope of 0.92) and azimuths (a slope of 1.02).
• - Overall, this study provides valuable insights into similarities and differences between magnetic field maps obtained by SO/PHI-HRT and SDO/HMI instruments which highlights their importance in gaining a more comprehensive understanding of the Sun's magnetic field when used simultaneously.

Scientists used two spacecraft, Solar Orbiter and Solar Dynamics Observatory, to study the Sun's magnetic field. They used special instruments called magnetographs to make maps of the magnetic field. Solar Orbiter's magnetograph is the first one to study the Sun's poles from a different angle. The scientists compared data from both spacecraft and found that they were very similar, but sometimes one instrument was better than the other depending on how strong the magnetic field was. This research helps us learn more about how the Sun's magnetic field works." Definitions: - Polarised light images: pictures of light waves that are all vibrating in the same direction - Magnetic field: an invisible force around a magnet or electrically charged object that can attract or repel other magnets or charged objects - Magnetograph: an instrument used to measure and map out magnetic fields - Infer: to figure out something based on evidence or clues - Pearson correlation coefficient: a way of measuring how closely related two sets of data are

Exploring the Magnetic Field of the Sun with Solar Orbiter and Solar Dynamics Observatory

Our sun is a powerful source of energy that has been studied for centuries. Scientists have developed various instruments to observe and measure its magnetic field, which plays an important role in solar activity. Two such instruments are the High Resolution Telescope (HRT) on board the Solar Orbiter spacecraft (SO) and the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). In a recent study, researchers aimed to compare data from these two instruments in order to gain a better understanding of our star's magnetic field.

The Instruments

The SO/PHI-HRT instrument uses polarised light images to infer photospheric magnetic fields. It is unique in that it is able to move out of the Sun-Earth line, providing unprecedented access to the Sun's poles. This makes it an invaluable tool for studying solar activity at different latitudes. On board SDO, HMI provides maps of vector magnetic fields at both 720 second and 90 second intervals.

The Study

For their study, researchers used data obtained during SO's inferior conjunction on 7 March 2022. They treated HRT data for geometric distortion and degraded it so that it had resolution similar to HMI data; they also re-projected HMI data so that there was only a 3 degree separation between them when compared side by side. When comparing line-of-sight magnetograms from both instruments, researchers found remarkable similarities: they had a slope coefficient of 0.97, an offset below 1 G, and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.97 - indicating almost perfect agreement between them! However, SO/PHI-HRT infers weaker line-of-sight fields for stronger fields than does HMI - likely due to noise in its data or differences in their respective resolutions or projections onto each other’s frames of reference.. As for vector magnetic fields comparison between SO/PHI-HRT and both 720 second & 90 second intervals HMI vector showed closer alignment with 90 seconds interval one – where SO/PHI-HRT measures stronger & more horizontal fields than those measured by HMI in weak signal regimes ($< 600$ G), while lower field strengths but with similar inclinations & azimuths were inferred by HRF in strong field regimes ($\gtrsim 600$ G). Slope values here were taken from comparison with 90 seconds interval results only .

Conclusion

This research paper provides valuable insights into similarities and differences between magnetic field maps obtained by SO/PHI-HRT and SDO/HMI instruments which highlights their importance in gaining a more comprehensive understanding of the Sun's magnetic field when used simultaneously. By combining these two tools together scientists can gain deeper insight into how our star works as well as uncover new phenomena related to solar activity - all thanks to advances made possible through modern technology!