Questions of science: chatting with ChatGPT about complex systems
AI-generated Key Points
- The study presents an overview of the complex systems field using ChatGPT, a large language model trained on a vast dataset of internet texts.
- The paper is divided into two parts: teaching and learning, where ChatGPT may work as a teacher assistant; and research, where ChatGPT works like a research assistant.
- Researchers and scientists studying and developing in the field of complex systems have made significant contributions.
- Half of the physics Nobel prize of 2021 was awarded to Giorgio Parisi for his contributions to the theory of complex systems; while Syukuro Manabe and Klaus Hasselmann were awarded for their modeling of Earth's climate.
- ChatGPT has demonstrated remarkable abilities to perform tasks such as completion tasks, question answering, reading comprehension, and translation that were once thought to be exclusive to humans.
- It is essential to use it carefully because if the data it uses to learn about the community has biases, ChatGPT may also learn and reproduce those biases.
- The study provides valuable insights into how ChatGPT can be used as a tool for understanding community ideas on teaching and research in complex systems.
- It highlights some challenges faced by researchers in this field such as dealing with complexity and uncertainty.
Authors: Nuno Crokidakis, Marcio Argollo de Menezes, Daniel O. Cajueiro
Abstract: We present an overview of the complex systems field using ChatGPT as a representation of the community's understanding. ChatGPT has learned language patterns and styles from a large dataset of internet texts, allowing it to provide answers that reflect common opinions, ideas, and language patterns found in the community. Our exploration covers both teaching and learning, and research topics. We recognize the value of ChatGPT as a source for the community's ideas.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.