Improving of Robotic Virtual Agent's errors that are accepted by reaction and human's preference

AI-generated keywords: Robotic Virtual Agent Human Empathy Agent Reaction Human Preference Anthropomorphic Agents

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study focuses on enhancing the relationship between humans and anthropomorphic agents through empathy
  • Investigates impact of agent reaction and human preference on human empathy and acceptance of agent's mistakes
  • Experiment involved intentional mistake made by agent during task with a human
  • Four-condition, three-factor mixed design employed to identify significant factors for designing empathetic robotic agents
  • Results showed that neither agent reaction nor human preference significantly affected empathy towards the agent
  • Robotic agent's mistakes during the task were allowed by these factors
  • Empathy for the agent decreased among participants when an error was made
  • Insights provided into controlling impressions of robotic virtual agents' behaviors in society
  • Understanding how humans perceive actions of anthropomorphic agents is crucial for positive relationships between humans and robots
  • Designers can refine robotic agents based on factors like agent reaction and human preference to create more meaningful interactions
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Takahiro Tsumura, Seiji Yamada

13 pages, 4 figures, 5 tables, submitted ICSR2023. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2206.06128

Abstract: One way to improve the relationship between humans and anthropomorphic agents is to have humans empathize with the agents. In this study, we focused on a task between an agent and a human in which the agent makes a mistake. To investigate significant factors for designing a robotic agent that can promote humans empathy, we experimentally examined the hypothesis that agent reaction and human's preference affect human empathy and acceptance of the agent's mistakes. The experiment consisted of a four-condition, three-factor mixed design with agent reaction, selected agent's body color for human's preference, and pre- and post-task as factors. The results showed that agent reaction and human's preference did not affect empathy toward the agent but did allow the agent to make mistakes. It was also shown that empathy for the agent decreased when the agent made a mistake on the task. The results of this study provide a way to control impressions of the robotic virtual agent's behaviors, which are increasingly used in society.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.00247v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study titled "Improving of Robotic Virtual Agent's errors that are accepted by reaction and human's preference," authors Takahiro Tsumura and Seiji Yamada explore ways to enhance the relationship between humans and anthropomorphic agents by focusing on empathy. The researchers investigate the impact of agent reaction and human preference on human empathy and acceptance of the agent's mistakes. The experiment involved a task between an agent and a human, where the agent intentionally made a mistake. To identify significant factors for designing a robotic agent that can promote human empathy, the study employed a four-condition, three-factor mixed design. The factors included agent reaction, selected agent's body color based on human preference, and pre- and post-task evaluations. Contrary to expectations, the results revealed that neither agent reaction nor human preference significantly affected empathy towards the agent. However, these factors did allow the robotic agent to make mistakes during the task. Notably, when the agent made an error, empathy for the agent decreased among participants. This study provides valuable insights into controlling impressions of robotic virtual agents' behaviors in society. As these agents become increasingly prevalent in various domains, understanding how humans perceive their actions is crucial for fostering positive relationships between humans and anthropomorphic agents. By considering factors such as agent reaction and human preference, designers can refine robotic agents to better align with users' empathetic responses to create more meaningful interactions between people and robots.
Created on 29 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.