Inspecting and Editing Knowledge Representations in Language Models

AI-generated keywords: REMEDI Language Models Knowledge Representations Probing Prompting

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper explores the representation of facts in neural language models (LMs)
  • LMs encode facts based on training data and input text
  • REMEDI is introduced as a method for mapping natural language statements to fact encodings within an LM's internal representation system
  • REMEDI encodings serve as knowledge editors, allowing modifications to downstream generation for consistency with new facts
  • REMEDI encodings can be used as probes to compare with LM representations and identify properties attributed by LMs to mentioned entities
  • REMEDI offers a step towards developing general tools for inspection and control of knowledge in LMs
  • Understanding and managing factual representations within LMs is important for enhancing reliability and aligning them with real-world knowledge
  • The goal is to create more reliable systems that accurately represent factual information from different sources
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Evan Hernandez, Belinda Z. Li, Jacob Andreas

Abstract: Neural language models (LMs) represent facts about the world described by text. Sometimes these facts derive from training data (in most LMs, a representation of the word "banana" encodes the fact that bananas are fruits). Sometimes facts derive from input text itself (a representation of the sentence "I poured out the bottle" encodes the fact that the bottle became empty). We describe REMEDI, a method for learning to map statements in natural language to fact encodings in an LM's internal representation system. REMEDI encodings can be used as knowledge editors: when added to LM hidden representations, they modify downstream generation to be consistent with new facts. REMEDI encodings may also be used as probes: when compared to LM representations, they reveal which properties LMs already attribute to mentioned entities, in some cases making it possible to predict when LMs will generate outputs that conflict with background knowledge or input text. REMEDI thus links work on probing, prompting, and LM editing, and offers steps toward general tools for fine-grained inspection and control of knowledge in LMs.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.00740v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Inspecting and Editing Knowledge Representations in Language Models" by Evan Hernandez, Belinda Z. Li, and Jacob Andreas explores the representation of facts in neural language models (LMs). LMs encode facts about the world based on both training data and input text. For example, the word "banana" in an LM represents the fact that bananas are fruits, while a sentence like "I poured out the bottle" encodes the fact that the bottle became empty. The authors introduce REMEDI, a method for learning to map natural language statements to fact encodings within an LM's internal representation system. These REMEDI encodings serve as knowledge editors, allowing modifications to downstream generation to ensure consistency with new facts. Additionally, REMEDI encodings can be used as probes to compare with LM representations and identify properties attributed by LMs to mentioned entities. This enables predictions of when LMs might generate outputs conflicting with background knowledge or input text. By linking work on probing, prompting, and LM editing, REMEDI offers a step towards developing general tools for fine-grained inspection and control of knowledge in LMs. The authors emphasize the importance of understanding and managing the factual representations within LMs to enhance their reliability and align them with real-world knowledge. Through this approach they aim to create more reliable systems which can better represent factual information from different sources such as training data or user input text. Thus providing users with more accurate results which are consistent with their expectations from real-world knowledge.
Created on 06 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.