Polarization aberrations in next-generation giant segmented mirror telescopes (GSMTs) I. Effect on the coronagraphic performance
AI-generated Key Points
- Next-generation large segmented mirror telescopes are being developed to directly image and characterize Earth-like rocky planets
- High contrast limits of $10^{-7}$ to $10^{-8}$ are required at wavelengths ranging from I to J band
- Polarization aberrations arising from the reflection of light from the telescope's mirror surfaces and instrument optics affect the raw on-sky contrast
- Researchers simulated these aberrations and estimated their effect on achievable contrast for three next-generation ground-based large segmented mirror telescopes using ray-tracing in Zemax and a polarization ray-tracing algorithm
- The impact of these aberrations on contrast was estimated by propagating Jones pupil maps through idealized coronagraphs using hcipy, a physical optics-based simulation framework
- Polarization aberrations create significant leakage through a coronagraphic system, with retardance defocus being the dominant aberration originating from steep angles on primary and secondary mirrors, limiting contrast to $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-4}$ at 1 $\lambda/D$ at visible wavelengths and $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-6}$ at infrared wavelengths.
- Coatings play an important role in determining the strength of these aberrations.
- It is essential to consider polarization aberrations during high-contrast imaging instrument design for next generation extremely large telescopes.
- The paper provides a detailed description of each telescope's optical layout and proposed coronagraphic instruments in Section 2.
- Mitigation strategies such as polarimetry with high contrast imaging or incorporating compensation optics, robust coronagraphs, specialized coatings, calibration techniques, and data analysis approaches can be used to reduce or eliminate these effects.
- Section 8 emphasizes that considering polarization aberrations during high contrast imaging instrument design is crucial for next generation extremely large telescopes.
Authors: Ramya M. Anche, Jaren N. Ashcraft, Sebastiaan Y. Haffert, Maxwell A. Millar-Blanchaer, Ewan S. Douglas, Frans Snik, Grant Williams, Rob G. van Holstein, David Doelman, Kyle Van Gorkom, Warren Skidmore
Abstract: Next-generation large segmented mirror telescopes are expected to perform direct imaging and characterization of Earth-like rocky planets, which requires contrast limits of $10^{-7}$ to $10^{-8}$ at wavelengths from I to J band. One critical aspect affecting the raw on-sky contrast are polarization aberrations arising from the reflection from the telescope's mirror surfaces and instrument optics. We simulate the polarization aberrations and estimate their effect on the achievable contrast for three next-generation ground-based large segmented mirror telescopes. We performed ray-tracing in Zemax and computed the polarization aberrations and Jones pupil maps using the polarization ray-tracing algorithm. The impact of these aberrations on the contrast is estimated by propagating the Jones pupil maps through a set of idealized coronagraphs using hcipy, a physical optics-based simulation framework. The optical modeling of the giant segmented mirror telescopes (GSMTs) shows that polarization aberrations create significant leakage through a coronagraphic system. The dominant aberration is retardance defocus, which originates from the steep angles on the primary and secondary mirrors. The retardance defocus limits the contrast to $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-4}$ at 1 $\lambda/D$ at visible wavelengths, and $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-6}$ at infrared wavelengths. The simulations also show that the coating plays a major role in determining the strength of the aberrations. Polarization aberrations will need to be considered during the design of high-contrast imaging instruments for the next generation of extremely large telescopes. This can be achieved either through compensation optics, robust coronagraphs, specialized coatings, calibration, and data analysis approaches or by incorporating polarimetry with high-contrast imaging to measure these effects.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.