OpenAGI: When LLM Meets Domain Experts
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is a challenging task
- Recent developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable learning and reasoning abilities
- To achieve AGI, it is crucial to equip these models with the capability to harness various domain-specific expert models for complex task-solving
- OpenAGI project has been developed as an open-source AGI research platform that offers complex multi-step tasks accompanied by task-specific datasets, evaluation metrics, and a diverse range of extensible models
- OpenAGI formulates complex tasks as natural language queries that serve as input to the LLM
- The LLM then selects, synthesizes, and executes external models provided by OpenAGI to address the task at hand
- To improve the LLM's task-solving ability further, the project proposes a Reinforcement Learning from Task Feedback (RLTF) mechanism that uses the task-solving result as feedback
- Equipping large intelligent models with domain-specific expert knowledge is essential for achieving AGI
- OpenAGI demonstrates how LLMs can be used as controllers for selecting external expert models in solving complex tasks while RLTF provides feedback for self-improvement AI
- The authors have open sourced their codebase along with benchmarking and evaluation methods on GitHub
- Their work presents an exciting step forward in developing AGIs capable of solving increasingly complex problems.
Authors: Yingqiang Ge, Wenyue Hua, Jianchao Ji, Juntao Tan, Shuyuan Xu, Yongfeng Zhang
Abstract: Human intelligence has the remarkable ability to assemble basic skills into complex ones so as to solve complex tasks. This ability is equally important for Artificial Intelligence (AI), and thus, we assert that in addition to the development of large, comprehensive intelligent models, it is equally crucial to equip such models with the capability to harness various domain-specific expert models for complex task-solving in the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Recent developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable learning and reasoning abilities, making them promising as a controller to select, synthesize, and execute external models to solve complex tasks. In this project, we develop OpenAGI, an open-source AGI research platform, specifically designed to offer complex, multi-step tasks and accompanied by task-specific datasets, evaluation metrics, and a diverse range of extensible models. OpenAGI formulates complex tasks as natural language queries, serving as input to the LLM. The LLM subsequently selects, synthesizes, and executes models provided by OpenAGI to address the task. Furthermore, we propose a Reinforcement Learning from Task Feedback (RLTF) mechanism, which uses the task-solving result as feedback to improve the LLM's task-solving ability. Thus, the LLM is responsible for synthesizing various external models for solving complex tasks, while RLTF provides feedback to improve its task-solving ability, enabling a feedback loop for self-improving AI. We believe that the paradigm of LLMs operating various expert models for complex task-solving is a promising approach towards AGI. To facilitate the community's long-term improvement and evaluation of AGI's ability, we open-source the code, benchmark, and evaluation methods of the OpenAGI project at https://github.com/agiresearch/OpenAGI.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.