API-Bank: A Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Recent research highlights the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance contextual processing abilities using external tools
- Lack of systematic evaluation for LLMs' effectiveness in using these tools to respond to human instructions
- Introduction of API-Bank, a benchmark designed for Tool-Augmented LLMs
- API-Bank consists of 53 commonly used API tools and provides a comprehensive workflow
- Includes 264 annotated dialogues with a total of 568 API calls
- Aims to evaluate LLMs' ability to plan step-by-step API calls, retrieve relevant APIs, and accurately execute them to meet human needs
- Experimental results show improved tool usage in GPT-3.5 compared to GPT-3 and stronger planning performance in GPT-4
- Room for improvement compared to human performance
- Error analysis and case studies demonstrate feasibility and highlight challenges for future research
- Benchmark provides insights into capabilities and limitations of Tool-Augmented LLMs
- Foundation for further advancements in utilizing external tools for LLMs' contextual processing abilities towards achieving Artificial General Intelligence
Authors: Minghao Li, Feifan Song, Bowen Yu, Haiyang Yu, Zhoujun Li, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li
Abstract: Recent research has shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) can utilize external tools to improve their contextual processing abilities, moving away from the pure language modeling paradigm and paving the way for Artificial General Intelligence. Despite this, there has been a lack of systematic evaluation to demonstrate the efficacy of LLMs using tools to respond to human instructions. This paper presents API-Bank, the first benchmark tailored for Tool-Augmented LLMs. API-Bank includes 53 commonly used API tools, a complete Tool-Augmented LLM workflow, and 264 annotated dialogues that encompass a total of 568 API calls. These resources have been designed to thoroughly evaluate LLMs' ability to plan step-by-step API calls, retrieve relevant APIs, and correctly execute API calls to meet human needs. The experimental results show that GPT-3.5 emerges the ability to use the tools relative to GPT3, while GPT-4 has stronger planning performance. Nevertheless, there remains considerable scope for further improvement when compared to human performance. Additionally, detailed error analysis and case studies demonstrate the feasibility of Tool-Augmented LLMs for daily use, as well as the primary challenges that future research needs to address.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.