Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.08979v2

In this study, the researchers conducted a large-scale measurement of ChatGPT's reliability in generic question-answering scenarios. They carefully curated 5,695 questions across ten datasets and eight domains to assess ChatGPT's performance. The results showed that ChatGPT's reliability varied across different domains, with notable underperformance in law and science questions. The researchers also discovered that system roles designed by OpenAI could subtly impact ChatGPT's reliability. Additionally, they found that ChatGPT was vulnerable to adversarial examples where even a single character change could negatively affect its performance. The evaluation pipeline consisted of four steps: query formation, ChatGPT invocation, answer extraction, and evaluation. This workflow is illustrated in Figure 1. To categorize the questions into broad domains, the researchers used BERTopic for automatic topic modeling and applied deductive analysis. They tested five pre-trained embedding models for BERTopic and selected GTR-T5-XL based on its high CV coherence score. Through manual inspection and a priori coding approach, the data samples were categorized into history, law, general works, medicine, social science, science, technology and recreation domains. While acknowledging potential underrepresentation of certain domains due to their coding procedure,the researchers ensured adequate representation in the study by utilizing representative scores to filter out unclearly classified questions during topic modeling. The study included statistics of QA datasets such as yes/no QA (YN), multiple-choice QA (MC), extractive QA (EX), abstractive QA (AB) with varying numbers of questions and evaluation metrics. Overall,this research provides valuable insights into ChatGPT's reliability across different domains and highlights the importance of enhancing the reliability and security of large language models like ChatGPT.

• - Researchers conducted a large-scale measurement of ChatGPT's reliability in generic question-answering scenarios
• - 5,695 questions were curated across ten datasets and eight domains to assess ChatGPT's performance
• - ChatGPT's reliability varied across different domains, with notable underperformance in law and science questions
• - System roles designed by OpenAI could subtly impact ChatGPT's reliability
• - ChatGPT was vulnerable to adversarial examples where even a single character change could negatively affect its performance
• - Evaluation pipeline consisted of four steps: query formation, ChatGPT invocation, answer extraction, and evaluation
• - BERTopic was used for automatic topic modeling to categorize questions into broad domains; GTR-T5-XL was selected based on high CV coherence score
• - Data samples were categorized into history, law, general works, medicine, social science, science, technology and recreation domains through manual inspection and a priori coding approach
• - Study included statistics of QA datasets such as yes/no QA (YN), multiple-choice QA (MC), extractive QA (EX), abstractive QA (AB) with varying numbers of questions and evaluation metrics
• - Research provides insights into ChatGPT's reliability across different domains and emphasizes the importance of enhancing the reliability and security of large language models like ChatGPT.

SummaryResearchers tested how well ChatGPT can answer questions in different areas like law and science. They found that ChatGPT sometimes struggled with these types of questions. The way ChatGPT is set up can affect how reliable it is at answering questions. Sometimes, changing just one letter in a question can confuse ChatGPT. They used different methods to evaluate how well ChatGPT could answer questions in various topics. Definitions- Researchers: People who study and learn new things. - Reliability: How trustworthy or accurate something is. - Domains: Different areas or subjects, like law or science. - Vulnerable: Easily harmed or affected. - Adversarial examples: Tricky situations designed to confuse a system. - Evaluation pipeline: Steps taken to test and assess something's performance. - Topic modeling: Sorting questions into categories based on their main themes. - Categorized: Organized into groups based on similarities. - QA datasets: Collections of questions and answers for testing purposes. - Language models: Programs that understand and generate human language.

Large language models have become increasingly popular in recent years, with the development of advanced natural language processing techniques. These models are designed to generate human-like text responses and have been used for various applications such as chatbots, question-answering systems, and even content creation. One such model is ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, which has gained attention for its impressive performance in generating coherent and relevant responses. However, the reliability of large language models like ChatGPT has been a topic of concern among researchers. In this study, titled "Measuring the Reliability of ChatGPT in Generic Question-Answering Scenarios," the authors aimed to assess ChatGPT's performance in generic question-answering scenarios across different domains. To conduct their research, the authors carefully curated 5,695 questions from ten datasets across eight domains. These domains included history, law, general works, medicine, social science, science technology and recreation. The questions were categorized using BERTopic - an automatic topic modeling tool - and then further analyzed through manual inspection and a priori coding approach. The results showed that ChatGPT's reliability varied significantly across different domains. It performed well in some areas such as history and general works but underperformed in others like law and science questions. This highlights the need for further improvements to enhance its performance in these specific domains. One interesting finding was that system roles designed by OpenAI could subtly impact ChatGPT's reliability. This suggests that even small changes or biases within a model can significantly affect its performance. Moreover,the researchers also discovered that ChatGPT was vulnerable to adversarial examples where slight modifications to input data could lead to incorrect or irrelevant responses. This poses a significant challenge when it comes to deploying large language models like ChatGPT for real-world applications where accuracy is crucial. To evaluate ChatGPT's performance accurately,the researchers developed an evaluation pipeline consisting of four steps: query formation, ChatGPT invocation, answer extraction, and evaluation. This workflow is illustrated in Figure 1 of the research paper. The study also included statistics of QA datasets such as yes/no QA (YN), multiple-choice QA (MC), extractive QA (EX), abstractive QA (AB) with varying numbers of questions and evaluation metrics. These metrics were used to measure ChatGPT's performance and provide a comprehensive analysis of its reliability across different domains. However, the authors acknowledged potential underrepresentation of certain domains due to their coding procedure. To address this issue, they utilized representative scores to filter out unclearly classified questions during topic modeling. In conclusion,this research provides valuable insights into ChatGPT's reliability across different domains and highlights the importance of enhancing the reliability and security of large language models like ChatGPT. It also emphasizes the need for further research in this area to improve these models' performance and address their vulnerabilities. As large language models continue to advance and become more prevalent in our daily lives, it is crucial to understand their capabilities and limitations fully. Studies like this one help us gain a better understanding of these models' strengths and weaknesses, ultimately leading to more reliable and secure applications that utilize them.