Text-to-Audio Generation using Instruction-Tuned LLM and Latent Diffusion Model
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper proposes a novel approach called TANGO for text-to-audio (TTA) generation
- It adopts an instruction-tuned LLM Flan-T5 as the text encoder for TTA generation
- The authors use an LDM-based approach with an LLM text encoder to generate audio from textual descriptions
- To augment training samples, pressure level-based mixing method is employed instead of randomly generated combinations of audio pairs
- The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art AudioLDM on most metrics and stays comparable on the rest on AudioCaps test set despite training the LDM on a 63 times smaller dataset and keeping the text encoder frozen
- The improvement is attributed to the adoption of audio pressure level based sound mixing for training set augmentation
- The paper's contribution is threefold: proposing TANGO, showing that using an instruction tuned LLM improves performance, and demonstrating that pressure level based sound mixing can be more effective than random mixtures for training set augmentation.
- Overall, this paper presents promising results in generating audio from textual descriptions using an LDM based approach with an instruction tuned LLM as the text encoder.
Authors: Deepanway Ghosal, Navonil Majumder, Ambuj Mehrish, Soujanya Poria
Abstract: The immense scale of the recent large language models (LLM) allows many interesting properties, such as, instruction- and chain-of-thought-based fine-tuning, that has significantly improved zero- and few-shot performance in many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Inspired by such successes, we adopt such an instruction-tuned LLM Flan-T5 as the text encoder for text-to-audio (TTA) generation -- a task where the goal is to generate an audio from its textual description. The prior works on TTA either pre-trained a joint text-audio encoder or used a non-instruction-tuned model, such as, T5. Consequently, our latent diffusion model (LDM)-based approach TANGO outperforms the state-of-the-art AudioLDM on most metrics and stays comparable on the rest on AudioCaps test set, despite training the LDM on a 63 times smaller dataset and keeping the text encoder frozen. This improvement might also be attributed to the adoption of audio pressure level-based sound mixing for training set augmentation, whereas the prior methods take a random mix.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.