Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.02547v5

This study evaluates the behavior of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating content that aligns with specific personality traits. LLM personas are created based on the Big Five personality model and undergo a personality test and story writing task. However, some LLMs do not follow instructions to not explicitly mention their assigned personality traits in their stories. To assess the generated content, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) analysis is conducted on stories from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 personas. Additionally, human evaluators are recruited to rate the stories and infer the authors' personalities. The study design includes two conditions for human evaluators: being aware or unaware that the stories were written by an LLM. This aims to investigate how awareness of AI authorship impacts narrative evaluation and accuracy of personality predictions. The results reveal that most stories produced by GPT-3.5 personas contain explicit references to assigned personality traits, leading to a focus on stories generated by GPT-4 personas in final human evaluation. The researchers aim to identify patterns of linguistic characteristics corresponding to certain personality traits through LIWC analysis. These features are then compared with human-generated writing samples from the Essays dataset to understand if LLM personas can convincingly portray assigned personalities to human observers. In conclusion, this study suggests potential extensions for evaluating LLM personas in more real-life scenarios such as multi-round dialogues and action planning while considering ethical considerations surrounding AI authorship awareness. By providing a comprehensive evaluation of LLM personas' abilities in accurately reflecting specific personality traits, this research contributes towards understanding the capabilities and limitations of large language models in creating personalized content.

• - Study evaluates behavior of Large Language Models (LLMs) aligning with specific personality traits
• - LLM personas based on Big Five model undergo personality test and story writing task
• - Some LLMs do not follow instructions to avoid mentioning assigned personality traits in stories
• - Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) analysis conducted on GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 personas' stories
• - Human evaluators rate stories and infer authors' personalities under two conditions: aware or unaware of AI authorship
• - Most GPT-3.5 persona stories contain explicit references to assigned traits, leading focus on GPT-4 persona stories in final evaluation
• - Researchers aim to identify linguistic patterns corresponding to personality traits through LIWC analysis
• - Features compared with human-generated writing samples from Essays dataset to assess portrayal of personalities by LLM personas
• - Study suggests extensions for evaluating LLM personas in real-life scenarios, considering ethical implications of AI authorship awareness

Summary- Scientists studied how big computer programs can act like people with different personalities. - They made the programs take tests and write stories to see if they could show specific traits. - Some of the programs didn't do what they were told to hide their assigned traits in stories. - Experts checked the stories using a special tool to understand the words used by the programs. - People read the stories and tried to guess if a person or a computer wrote them, knowing or not knowing it was a computer. Definitions- Large Language Models (LLMs): Big computer programs that can understand and generate human-like language. - Personality traits: Different characteristics that make each person unique, like being kind, funny, or smart. - Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): A tool used to analyze written text for specific words and patterns. - GPT-3.5 and GPT-4: Names of specific large language models used in the study. - Ethical implications: Considering whether something is right or wrong based on moral principles.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been making headlines in recent years for their impressive ability to generate human-like text. These models, such as GPT-3 and GPT-4, are trained on massive amounts of data and can produce coherent and contextually relevant content on a wide range of topics. However, as these models become more advanced, there is growing concern about the potential impact they may have on society. One area of research that has emerged is the study of LLMs' behavior in generating content that aligns with specific personality traits. This research paper titled "Evaluating Large Language Models' Ability to Portray Assigned Personalities" delves into this topic by creating LLM personas based on the Big Five personality model and evaluating their ability to accurately reflect assigned personalities through story writing tasks. The first step in this study was to create LLM personas with distinct personalities based on the Big Five model: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. These personas were then subjected to a personality test and a story writing task where they were explicitly instructed not to mention their assigned personality traits in their stories. To assess the generated content's quality, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) analysis was conducted on stories from two different sets of LLM personas - GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. LIWC analysis is a tool used to measure linguistic characteristics in written text that correspond to certain psychological states or behaviors. In addition to LIWC analysis, human evaluators were recruited to rate the stories and infer the authors' personalities. The study design included two conditions for human evaluators: being aware or unaware that the stories were written by an LLM persona. This aimed to investigate how awareness of AI authorship impacts narrative evaluation and accuracy of personality predictions. The results revealed that most stories produced by GPT-3.5 personas contained explicit references to their assigned personality traits, leading to a focus on stories generated by GPT-4 personas in the final human evaluation. This suggests that GPT-4 personas were better at following instructions and not explicitly mentioning their assigned personalities. The researchers also aimed to identify patterns of linguistic characteristics corresponding to certain personality traits through LIWC analysis. These features were then compared with human-generated writing samples from the Essays dataset to understand if LLM personas can convincingly portray assigned personalities to human observers. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of large language models in creating personalized content. It suggests potential extensions for evaluating LLM personas in more real-life scenarios such as multi-round dialogues and action planning while considering ethical considerations surrounding AI authorship awareness. This research contributes towards understanding the impact of LLMs on society and highlights the need for further exploration into their abilities and limitations. As these models continue to advance, it is crucial to consider ethical implications and ensure responsible use of AI technology.