Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs

AI-generated keywords: Text-to-SQL Codex ChatGPT Bird Database Values

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Text-to-SQL parsing involves converting natural language instructions into executable SQL queries
  • Models like Codex and ChatGPT have shown impressive results in text-to-SQL tasks
  • Existing benchmarks such as Spider and WikiSQL focus on limited database schema and contents, creating a gap between research and real-world applications
  • Bird is a comprehensive benchmark designed for large-scale databases in text-to-SQL tasks
  • Bird consists of 12,751 pairs of text-to-SQL data and encompasses 95 databases spanning 37 professional domains, with a total size of 33.4 GB
  • Bird highlights challenges related to handling dirty database contents, leveraging external knowledge, and optimizing SQL efficiency for massive databases
  • Text-to-SQL models need to comprehend database values to tackle these challenges effectively
  • State-of-the-art models like ChatGPT have an execution accuracy of only 40.08%, far from human performance level (92.96%)
  • Efficiency analysis provides insights into generating efficient SQL queries for industries
  • Bird will contribute to advancing real-world applications of text-to-SQL research
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jinyang Li, Binyuan Hui, Ge Qu, Binhua Li, Jiaxi Yang, Bowen Li, Bailin Wang, Bowen Qin, Rongyu Cao, Ruiying Geng, Nan Huo, Xuanhe Zhou, Chenhao Ma, Guoliang Li, Kevin C. C. Chang, Fei Huang, Reynold Cheng, Yongbin Li

Abstract: Text-to-SQL parsing, which aims at converting natural language instructions into executable SQLs, has gained increasing attention in recent years. In particular, Codex and ChatGPT have shown impressive results in this task. However, most of the prevalent benchmarks, i.e., Spider, and WikiSQL, focus on database schema with few rows of database contents leaving the gap between academic study and real-world applications. To mitigate this gap, we present Bird, a big benchmark for large-scale database grounded in text-to-SQL tasks, containing 12,751 pairs of text-to-SQL data and 95 databases with a total size of 33.4 GB, spanning 37 professional domains. Our emphasis on database values highlights the new challenges of dirty database contents, external knowledge between NL questions and database contents, and SQL efficiency, particularly in the context of massive databases. To solve these problems, text-to-SQL models must feature database value comprehension in addition to semantic parsing. The experimental results demonstrate the significance of database values in generating accurate text-to-SQLs for big databases. Furthermore, even the most effective text-to-SQL models, i.e. ChatGPT, only achieves 40.08% in execution accuracy, which is still far from the human result of 92.96%, proving that challenges still stand. Besides, we also provide an efficiency analysis to offer insights into generating text-to-efficient-SQLs that are beneficial to industries. We believe that BIRD will contribute to advancing real-world applications of text-to-SQL research. The leaderboard and source code are available: https://bird-bench.github.io/.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.03111v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The field of text-to-SQL parsing, which involves converting natural language instructions into executable SQL queries, has gained significant attention in recent years. Notably, models like Codex and ChatGPT have shown impressive results in this task. However, existing benchmarks such as Spider and WikiSQL primarily focus on database schema with limited rows of database contents, creating a gap between academic research and real-world applications. To address this gap, the authors introduce Bird, a comprehensive benchmark designed for large-scale databases in text-to-SQL tasks. Bird consists of 12,751 pairs of text-to-SQL data and encompasses 95 databases spanning 37 professional domains, with a total size of 33.4 GB. The emphasis on database values in Bird highlights new challenges related to handling dirty database contents, leveraging external knowledge to connect natural language questions with database contents, and optimizing SQL efficiency specifically for massive databases. The authors argue that text-to-SQL models need to go beyond semantic parsing and also feature comprehension of database values to tackle these challenges effectively. Experimental results demonstrate the significance of incorporating database values for generating accurate text-to-SQL queries for large databases. Despite the effectiveness of state-of-the-art models like ChatGPT, their execution accuracy remains at only 40.08%, far from the human performance level of 92.96%. This indicates that substantial challenges still exist in this domain. Additionally, the authors provide an efficiency analysis to offer insights into generating text-to efficient SQL queries that can benefit industries. They believe that Bird will contribute to advancing real world applications of text to SQL research. Interested researchers can access the leaderboard and source code for Bird at https://birdbenchgithubio/.
Created on 25 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.