Retrieval-augmented GPT-3.5-based Text-to-SQL Framework with Sample-aware Prompting and Dynamic Revision Chain

AI-generated keywords: Text-to-SQL LLM Syntax Requirements Retrieval-Augmented Prompting Dynamic Revision Chain

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Text-to-SQL generation is crucial for effective database querying
  • Prompt learning with large language models (LLMs) is a promising approach
  • Existing methods face challenges in meeting SQL syntax requirements
  • Proposed retrieval-augmented prompting method for LLM-based Text-to-SQL framework
  • Method incorporates sample-aware demonstrations and fine-grained information
  • Two strategies proposed for retrieving questions with similar intents
  • Dynamic revision chain designed to generate executable and accurate SQL queries
  • Experimental results show that this method outperforms baseline models on three benchmarks.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Chunxi Guo, Zhiliang Tian, Jintao Tang, Shasha Li, Zhihua Wen, Kaixuan Wang, Ting Wang

Abstract: Text-to-SQL aims at generating SQL queries for the given natural language questions and thus helping users to query databases. Prompt learning with large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a recent approach, which designs prompts to lead LLMs to understand the input question and generate the corresponding SQL. However, it faces challenges with strict SQL syntax requirements. Existing work prompts the LLMs with a list of demonstration examples (i.e. question-SQL pairs) to generate SQL, but the fixed prompts can hardly handle the scenario where the semantic gap between the retrieved demonstration and the input question is large. In this paper, we propose a retrieval-augmented prompting method for a LLM-based Text-to-SQL framework, involving sample-aware prompting and a dynamic revision chain. Our approach incorporates sample-aware demonstrations, which include the composition of SQL operators and fine-grained information related to the given question. To retrieve questions sharing similar intents with input questions, we propose two strategies for assisting retrieval. Firstly, we leverage LLMs to simplify the original questions, unifying the syntax and thereby clarifying the users' intentions. To generate executable and accurate SQLs without human intervention, we design a dynamic revision chain which iteratively adapts fine-grained feedback from the previously generated SQL. Experimental results on three Text-to-SQL benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of our method over strong baseline models.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.05074v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of Text-to-SQL, the generation of SQL queries from natural language questions is crucial for users to effectively query databases. Prompt learning with large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising approach for this task. However, existing methods face challenges in meeting strict SQL syntax requirements. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a retrieval-augmented prompting method for a LLM-based Text-to-SQL framework. The method incorporates sample-aware demonstrations that include the composition of SQL operators and fine-grained information related to the given question. To retrieve questions with similar intents to the input question, two strategies are proposed: leveraging LLMs to simplify original questions and unify syntax to clarify user intentions. Additionally, to generate executable and accurate SQL queries without human intervention, a dynamic revision chain is designed. This chain iteratively adapts fine-grained feedback from previously generated SQL queries. Experimental results on three Text-to-SQL benchmarks demonstrate that this method outperforms strong baseline models.
Created on 09 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.