T-SciQ: Teaching Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Large Language Model Signals for Science Question Answering

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Natural Language Processing Chain-of-Thought T-SciQ ScienceQA

AI-generated Key Points

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various NLP tasks, including complex chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning.
  • Collecting high-quality CoT rationales for training these models is laborious and costly.
  • The proposed T-SciQ method aims to teach science question answering with LLM signals.
  • T-SciQ generates high-quality CoT rationales as teaching signals and trains smaller models for CoT reasoning in complex multimodal scenarios.
  • T-SciQ introduces a novel data mixing strategy to produce more effective teaching data samples.
  • Experimental results on the ScienceQA benchmark show that T-SciQ achieves a new state-of-the-art performance with an accuracy of 96.18%.
  • T-SciQ outperforms the most powerful fine-tuned baseline by 4.5%.
  • This work focuses on mixing single and multi-step reasoning chains based on validation set predictions, setting it apart from previous studies.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Lei Wang, Yi Hu, Jiabang He, Xing Xu, Ning Liu, Hui Liu, Heng Tao Shen

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional performance in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. They have also shown the ability to perform chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex problems. Recent studies have explored CoT reasoning in complex multimodal scenarios, such as the science question answering task, by fine-tuning multimodal models with high-quality human-annotated CoT rationales. However, collecting high-quality COT rationales is usually time-consuming and costly. Besides, the annotated rationales are hardly accurate due to the redundant information involved or the essential information missed. To address these issues, we propose a novel method termed \emph{T-SciQ} that aims at teaching science question answering with LLM signals. The T-SciQ approach generates high-quality CoT rationales as teaching signals and is advanced to train much smaller models to perform CoT reasoning in complex modalities. Additionally, we introduce a novel data mixing strategy to produce more effective teaching data samples for simple and complex science question answer problems. Extensive experimental results show that our T-SciQ method achieves a new state-of-the-art performance on the ScienceQA benchmark, with an accuracy of 96.18%. Moreover, our approach outperforms the most powerful fine-tuned baseline by 4.5%.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.03453v2

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, including complex chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. However, collecting high-quality CoT rationales for training these models is a laborious and costly process. To address this issue, the proposed T-SciQ method aims to teach science question answering with LLM signals. It generates high-quality CoT rationales as teaching signals and trains smaller models to perform CoT reasoning in complex multimodal scenarios. The approach also introduces a novel data mixing strategy to produce more effective teaching data samples. Experimental results on the ScienceQA benchmark demonstrate that T-SciQ achieves a new state-of-the-art performance with an accuracy of 96.18%, outperforming the most powerful fine-tuned baseline by 4.5%. Additionally, this work focuses on mixing single and multi step reasoning chains based on validation set predictions, setting it apart from previous studies.
Created on 08 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.