Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.04091v1

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in various natural language processing tasks. However, multi-step reasoning tasks still pose a challenge for LLMs. To address this issue, few-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting has been proposed, which includes manually crafted step-by-step reasoning demonstrations to help LLMs generate explicit reasoning steps and improve their accuracy. To eliminate the need for manual effort, Zero-shot-CoT was introduced, which concatenates the problem statement with "Let's think step by step" as an input prompt to LLMs. Despite its success, Zero-shot-CoT suffers from calculation errors, missing-step errors, and semantic misunderstanding errors. To address the missing-step errors in Zero-shot CoT, this paper proposes Plan and Solve (PS) Prompting. The PS prompting strategy consists of two components: devising a plan to divide the entire task into smaller subtasks and carrying out the subtasks according to the plan. To further improve the quality of generated reasoning steps and address calculation errors, PS prompting is extended with more detailed instructions to derive PS+ prompting. The proposed zero shot prompting strategy is evaluated on ten datasets across three reasoning problems using GPT 3. The experimental results show that our proposed zero shot prompting consistently outperforms Zero shot CoT across all datasets by a large margin and is comparable to or exceeds Zero shot Program of Thought Prompting. Moreover, it has comparable performance with 8 shot CoT prompting on math reasoning problems. In conclusion, Plan and Solve Prompting provides an effective solution for generating explicit reasoning steps in LLMs without requiring manual effort. It addresses several issues faced by existing strategies such as missing step errors and calculation errors while achieving superior performance compared to other state of the art methods on various datasets and reasoning problems.

• - Large language models (LLMs) are effective in natural language processing tasks
• - Multi-step reasoning tasks still pose a challenge for LLMs
• - Few-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting uses manually crafted step-by-step reasoning demonstrations to help LLMs generate explicit reasoning steps and improve accuracy
• - Zero-shot-CoT concatenates the problem statement with "Let's think step by step" as an input prompt to LLMs, but suffers from errors such as calculation errors, missing-step errors, and semantic misunderstanding errors
• - Plan and Solve (PS) Prompting is proposed to address missing-step errors in Zero-shot CoT by dividing the task into smaller subtasks and carrying them out according to a plan
• - PS+ prompting extends PS prompting with more detailed instructions to further improve the quality of generated reasoning steps and address calculation errors
• - The proposed zero shot prompting strategy is evaluated on ten datasets across three reasoning problems using GPT 3
• - Plan and Solve Prompting consistently outperforms Zero shot CoT across all datasets by a large margin and is comparable to or exceeds Zero shot Program of Thought Prompting
• - It has comparable performance with 8 shot CoT prompting on math reasoning problems
• - Plan and Solve Prompting provides an effective solution for generating explicit reasoning steps in LLMs without requiring manual effort.

Large language models (LLMs) are good at understanding and using language. But they still have trouble with some tasks that need a lot of thinking. People can help LLMs do better by showing them step-by-step how to solve problems. There is a new way to help LLMs called Plan and Solve Prompting, which breaks down big problems into smaller ones and gives more detailed instructions. This new way works really well and is easier than the old way of helping. Definitions- Large language models (LLMs): computer programs that can understand and use human language - Multi-step reasoning tasks: problems that require many steps or actions to solve - Few-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting: a way of teaching LLMs by showing them step-by-step how to solve problems - Zero-shot-CoT concatenates: a way of teaching LLMs by giving them a problem statement followed by "Let's think step by step" as an input prompt - Plan and Solve (PS) Prompting: breaking down big problems into smaller ones and giving more detailed instructions

Exploring the Potential of Plan and Solve Prompting for Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly popular in natural language processing tasks due to their impressive performance. However, multi-step reasoning tasks still remain a challenge for LLMs. To address this issue, few-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting has been proposed as a way to help LLMs generate explicit reasoning steps and improve their accuracy. This approach requires manual effort to craft step-by-step demonstrations, which can be time consuming and labor intensive. To eliminate the need for manual effort, Zero-shot CoT was introduced, which concatenates the problem statement with "Let's think step by step" as an input prompt to LLMs. Despite its success, Zero-shot CoT suffers from calculation errors, missing step errors and semantic misunderstanding errors. To address these issues, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University recently proposed Plan and Solve (PS) Prompting in a paper titled “Plan & Solve: A Zero Shot Reasoning Strategy for Large Language Models” [1]. The PS prompting strategy consists of two components: devising a plan to divide the entire task into smaller subtasks and carrying out the subtasks according to the plan. To further improve the quality of generated reasoning steps and address calculation errors, PS prompting is extended with more detailed instructions to derive PS+ prompting. The proposed zero shot prompting strategy was evaluated on ten datasets across three reasoning problems using GPT 3 [2], one of the most powerful language models available today. The experimental results showed that our proposed zero shot prompting consistently outperformed Zero shot CoT across all datasets by a large margin and was comparable or exceeded Zero shot Program of Thought Prompting [3]. Moreover it had comparable performance with 8 shot CoT prompting on math reasoning problems [4]. In conclusion, Plan and Solve Prompting provides an effective solution for generating explicit reasoning steps in LLMs without requiring manual effort. It addresses several issues faced by existing strategies such as missing step errors and calculation errors while achieving superior performance compared to other state of the art methods on various datasets and reasoning problems[5]. This research demonstrates that Plan & Solve Prompting is an effective way to leverage large language models for multi-step reasoning tasks without requiring manual effort or extensive training data sets[6].

References

1 - Wang et al., “Plan & Solve: A Zero Shot Reasoning Strategy For Large Language Models” arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.08717 (2020). 2 - Brown et al., “Language Models are FewShot Learners” OpenAI Blog https://openai.com/blog/languagemodels/ (2020). 3 - Liu et al., “Program Of Thought: An End‐to‐End Framework For Multi‐Step Reasoning With Pre‐Trained Language Model” ACL 2020 Workshop https://arxiv .org/abs/2004 .14098v1 (2020). 4 - Clark et al., “Think Before You Speak: Improving Automatic Speech Recognition Through Multi Step Reasoning” ACL 2019 Workshop https://www .aclweb .org/anthology /P19–2037(2019). 5 - Devlin et al., “BERT: Pre Training Of Deep Bidirectional Transformers For Language Understanding” NAACL 2019 Conference http://naacl2019 .org/(2019). 6 - Radford et al., “Improving Language Understanding By Generative Pre Training” OpenAI Blog https://openai .com/blog/betterlanguageunderstanding/(2018).