Breakdown of the Newton-Einstein Standard Gravity at Low Acceleration in Internal Dynamics of Wide Binary Stars
AI-generated Key Points
- Researchers have discovered a gravitational anomaly in the internal dynamics of wide binary stars at weak gravitational acceleration.
- They used implicit high-order multiplicities and calibrated the multiplicity fraction to align the internal motions of binaries statistically with Newtonian dynamics at higher accelerations.
- Data from the Gaia EDR3 database was used to analyze observed sky-projected motions and separation using a Monte Carlo method.
- The empirical acceleration relation at weak gravitational accelerations below $10^{-9}$ m s$^{-2}$ deviates systematically from what is expected based on Newtonian dynamics.
- The researchers measured a gravitational anomaly parameter $\delta_{\rm{obs-newt}}$, which represented the difference between observed acceleration and the Newtonian prediction.
- At $g_{\rm{N}} \approx 10^{-8.91}$ and $10^{-10.15}$ m s$^{-2}$, $\delta_{\rm{obs-newt}}$ was found to be equal to $0.034\pm 0.007$ and $0.109\pm 0.013$, respectively, with both deviations in the same direction and significant at a level of $10\sigma$.
- At $g_{\rm{N}} = 10^{-10.15}$ m s$^{-2}$, the observed to Newtonian predicted acceleration ratio was equal to $1.43\pm 0.06$, aligning with predictions from alternative theories like AQUAL for kinematic accelerations in circular orbits under the Galactic external field.
- This study provides compelling evidence for a breakdown of standard gravity at weak gravitational accelerations based on observations of wide binary stars, challenging our current understanding of gravity.
- Further research is needed to fully understand its implications and potential impact on our understanding fundamental physics.
Authors: Kyu-Hyun Chae
Abstract: A gravitational anomaly is found at weak gravitational acceleration $g_{\rm{N}} < 10^{-9}$ m s$^{-2}$ from analyses of the dynamics of wide binary stars selected from the Gaia EDR3 database that have accurate distances, proper motions, and reliably inferred stellar masses. Implicit high-order multiplicities are required and the multiplicity fraction is calibrated so that binary internal motions agree statistically with Newtonian dynamics at a high enough acceleration of $10^{-8}$ m s$^{-2}$. The observed sky-projected motions and separation are deprojected to the three-dimensional relative velocity $v$ and separation $r$ through a Monte Carlo method, and a statistical relation between the Newtonian acceleration $g_{\rm{N}} \equiv GM/r^2$ (where $M$ is the total mass of the binary system) and a kinematic acceleration $g \equiv v^2/r$ is compared with the corresponding relation predicted by Newtonian dynamics. The empirical acceleration relation at $< 10^{-9}$ m s$^{-2}$ systematically deviates from the Newtonian expectation. A gravitational anomaly parameter $\delta_{\rm{obs-newt}}$ between the observed acceleration at $g_{\rm{N}}$ and the Newtonian prediction is measured to be: $\delta_{\rm{obs-newt}}= 0.034\pm 0.007$ and $0.109\pm 0.013$ at $g_{\rm{N}}\approx10^{-8.91}$ and $10^{-10.15}$ m s$^{-2}$, from the main sample of 26,615 wide binaries within 200 pc. These two deviations in the same direction represent a $10\sigma$ significance. The deviation represents a direct evidence for the breakdown of standard gravity at weak acceleration. At $g_{\rm{N}}=10^{-10.15}$ m s$^{-2}$, the observed to Newton predicted acceleration ratio is $g_{\rm{obs}}/g_{\rm{pred}}=10^{\sqrt{2}\delta_{\rm{obs-newt}}}=1.43\pm 0.06$. This systematic deviation agrees with the boost factor that the AQUAL theory predicts for kinematic accelerations in circular orbits under the Galactic external field.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.