Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.08377v1

, , , , This paper presents Clue And Reasoning Prompting (CARP) as a solution to enhance the performance of large-scale Language Models (LLMs) in text classification tasks. While LLMs like GPT-3 have achieved remarkable success, they still underperform compared to fine-tuned models in text classification. This is due to their lack of reasoning ability in addressing complex linguistic phenomena and the limited number of tokens allowed in in-context learning. To overcome these limitations, CARP adopts a progressive reasoning strategy tailored specifically for handling complex linguistic phenomena involved in text classification. It first prompts LLMs to identify superficial clues such as keywords, tones, semantic relations, and references. Based on these clues, CARP induces a diagnostic reasoning process for making final decisions. In addition, CARP utilizes a fine-tuned model on a supervised dataset for kNN demonstration search during the in-context learning phase. This allows the model to leverage both the generalization ability of LLMs and the task-specific evidence provided by the labeled dataset. The results demonstrate that CARP achieves new state-of-the-art performances on four out of five widely-used text-classification benchmarks: SST-2, AGNews, R8, and R52. It also performs comparably to state-of-the-art models on MR benchmark. Notably, CARP shows impressive abilities in low-resource and domain-adaptation setups. With only 16 examples per class, CARP achieves comparable performances to supervised models with 1,024 examples per class. The related work section discusses large language models (LLMs) and categorizes them into encoder-only models like BERT and decoder-only models like GPT. These models follow the pre-training then fine-tuning paradigm for NLP tasks. In conclusion, CARP significantly improves text classification performance by incorporating clue-based prompting and reasoning strategies into large-scale Language Models (LLMs). The approach achieves state-of-the-art results on multiple benchmarks and demonstrates promising capabilities in low-resource and domain-adaptation scenarios. Future work aims to explore CARP in other natural language understanding tasks.

• - CARP enhances the performance of large-scale Language Models (LLMs) in text classification tasks.
• - LLMs like GPT-3 underperform compared to fine-tuned models in text classification due to their lack of reasoning ability and limited number of tokens allowed in in-context learning.
• - CARP adopts a progressive reasoning strategy by prompting LLMs to identify superficial clues and inducing a diagnostic reasoning process for making final decisions.
• - CARP utilizes a fine-tuned model on a supervised dataset for kNN demonstration search during the in-context learning phase.
• - CARP achieves new state-of-the-art performances on four out of five widely-used text-classification benchmarks: SST-2, AGNews, R8, and R52. It performs comparably to state-of-the-art models on MR benchmark.
• - CARP shows impressive abilities in low-resource and domain-adaptation setups, achieving comparable performances with only 16 examples per class compared to supervised models with 1,024 examples per class.
• - The related work section discusses large language models (LLMs) categorized into encoder-only models like BERT and decoder-only models like GPT.
• - CARP significantly improves text classification performance by incorporating clue-based prompting and reasoning strategies into LLMs.
• - Future work aims to explore CARP in other natural language understanding tasks.

CARP is a method that helps computers understand and classify text better. LLMs like GPT-3 struggle with understanding text because they can't reason well and have limits on how much they can learn from context. CARP helps LLMs by teaching them to look for simple clues and use reasoning to make decisions. During learning, CARP uses a model that has been trained on a dataset to help with searching for similar examples. CARP performs really well in different text classification tests and can even work with limited resources.

Introduction: The field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) has seen rapid advancements in recent years, thanks to the development of large-scale Language Models (LLMs). These models have shown impressive abilities in various NLP tasks such as text generation, machine translation, and text classification. However, despite their success, LLMs still struggle with complex linguistic phenomena involved in text classification tasks. To address this issue, a team of researchers has proposed a new approach called Clue And Reasoning Prompting (CARP). Overview of CARP: CARP is a progressive reasoning strategy that aims to enhance the performance of LLMs in text classification tasks. It combines both the generalization ability of LLMs and task-specific evidence provided by labeled datasets to achieve state-of-the-art results on multiple benchmarks. Reasoning Strategy: The first step in CARP is prompting LLMs to identify superficial clues such as keywords, tones, semantic relations, and references. These clues serve as initial hints for the model to make decisions about the input text. Based on these clues, CARP then induces a diagnostic reasoning process where it analyzes the input text further and makes final decisions. In-Context Learning: To further improve its reasoning abilities, CARP also utilizes a fine-tuned model on a supervised dataset during the in-context learning phase. This allows the model to leverage both the generalization ability of LLMs and task-specific evidence provided by labeled data. Results: The researchers evaluated CARP's performance on five widely-used text-classification benchmarks: SST-2, AGNews, R8, R52,and MR benchmark. The results showed that CARP achieved new state-of-the-art performances on four out of five benchmarks and performed comparably to state-of-the-art models on MR benchmark. Impressive Capabilities: One notable aspect of CARP is its impressive capabilities in low-resource and domain-adaptation scenarios. With only 16 examples per class, CARP achieved comparable performances to supervised models with 1,024 examples per class. This makes it a promising approach for real-world applications where labeled data is scarce. Related Work: The article also discusses the related work in the field of large language models (LLMs) and categorizes them into encoder-only models like BERT and decoder-only models like GPT. These models follow the pre-training then fine-tuning paradigm for NLP tasks. Conclusion: In conclusion, CARP significantly improves text classification performance by incorporating clue-based prompting and reasoning strategies into large-scale Language Models (LLMs). The approach achieves state-of-the-art results on multiple benchmarks and demonstrates promising capabilities in low-resource and domain-adaptation scenarios. Future work aims to explore CARP in other natural language understanding tasks. Final Thoughts: CARP presents an innovative solution to enhance the performance of LLMs in text classification tasks. Its progressive reasoning strategy and utilization of both LLMs' generalization ability and task-specific evidence make it a powerful approach for addressing complex linguistic phenomena. With its impressive capabilities in low-resource settings, CARP has the potential to be applied in various real-world applications that require accurate text classification. Further research on this approach could lead to even more significant advancements in NLP.