Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model

AI-generated keywords: Reinforcement Learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • Introduction of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) parameterization in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF)
  • DPO allows for extraction of optimal policy in closed form, simplifying the process and eliminating complex procedures like fitting a reward model and fine-tuning large unsupervised language models
  • DPO algorithm is stable, performant, and computationally lightweight, outperforming existing methods in aligning language models with human preferences
  • Superior results achieved by DPO in sentiment control compared to other methods like zero-shot prompting with GPT-J and 2-shot prompting with Pythia-2.8B
  • Effectiveness of DPO demonstrated in controlled sentiment generation, summarization, and dialogue tasks without extensive hyperparameter tuning or sampling from the LM during fine-tuning
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Stefano Ermon, Christopher D. Manning, Chelsea Finn

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: While large-scale unsupervised language models (LMs) learn broad world knowledge and some reasoning skills, achieving precise control of their behavior is difficult due to the completely unsupervised nature of their training. Existing methods for gaining such steerability collect human labels of the relative quality of model generations and fine-tune the unsupervised LM to align with these preferences, often with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, RLHF is a complex and often unstable procedure, first fitting a reward model that reflects the human preferences, and then fine-tuning the large unsupervised LM using reinforcement learning to maximize this estimated reward without drifting too far from the original model. In this paper we introduce a new parameterization of the reward model in RLHF that enables extraction of the corresponding optimal policy in closed form, allowing us to solve the standard RLHF problem with only a simple classification loss. The resulting algorithm, which we call Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), is stable, performant, and computationally lightweight, eliminating the need for sampling from the LM during fine-tuning or performing significant hyperparameter tuning. Our experiments show that DPO can fine-tune LMs to align with human preferences as well as or better than existing methods. Notably, fine-tuning with DPO exceeds PPO-based RLHF in ability to control sentiment of generations, and matches or improves response quality in summarization and single-turn dialogue while being substantially simpler to implement and train.

Submitted to arXiv on 29 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.18290v3

, , , , In this paper, the authors introduce a new parameterization of the reward model in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) called Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). This new approach allows for the extraction of the optimal policy in closed form, simplifying the process and eliminating the need for complex procedures like fitting a reward model and fine-tuning large unsupervised language models (LMs) using reinforcement learning. The DPO algorithm is stable, performant, and computationally lightweight, outperforming existing methods in aligning LMs with human preferences. In this study, a new approach called Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is proposed for optimizing reinforcement learning from human feedback. DPO aims to extract an optimal policy in closed form without relying on complex procedures such as fitting a reward model or fine-tuning large unsupervised language models. The DPO algorithm is shown to be stable, efficient and outperforms existing methods in aligning language models with human preferences. Experiments conducted on various text generation tasks demonstrate DPO's effectiveness in controlled sentiment generation, summarization, and dialogue tasks without extensive hyperparameter tuning or sampling from the LM during fine-tuning. <kd>Sentiment Control:</kc>DPO achieves superior results compared to existing methods such as zero-shot prompting with GPT-J and 2-shot prompting with Pythia-2.8B in controlling sentiment and improving response quality. Overall, DPO proves to be a stable and efficient method for fine-tuning LMs to align with human preferences across various text generation tasks. Its simplicity in implementation and training make it a promising approach for achieving precise control over large-scale unsupervised language models.
Created on 14 May. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.