In recent years, language models have made significant advancements in dialogue generation tasks. However, when it comes to generating responses that require factual knowledge, these models still fall short due to a lack of mechanisms for retrieving, encoding, and reflecting knowledge in the generated responses. Some methods have attempted to address this issue by leveraging facts from Knowledge Graphs (KGs), but they do not guarantee that the model will utilize relevant knowledge from the KG. To overcome this limitation, we propose a framework called SUbgraph Retrieval-augmented GEneration (SURGE) for generating context-relevant and knowledge-grounded dialogues using KGs. <SURGE Framework>
The SURGE framework consists of two main steps: subgraph retrieval and response generation. In the subgraph retrieval step, we retrieve the relevant subgraph from the KG that contains the necessary factual knowledge for generating an informed response. In the response generation step, we enforce consistency across facts by perturbing their word embeddings conditioned on the retrieved subgraph. To ensure that our generated responses are faithful to the retrieved subgraphs, we employ contrastive learning. This helps us achieve high similarity between the generated texts and the retrieved subgraphs. <Subgraph Retrieval>
To validate our SURGE framework's effectiveness in generating context-relevant and knowledgeable dialogues, we conducted experiments on OpendialKG and KOMODIS datasets. The results demonstrate that our approach generates high-quality responses that accurately reflect knowledge from KGs. <Human Study>
In addition to quantitative evaluations, we also conducted a human study involving 46 annotators to evaluate our generated responses' quality compared to other approaches such as All Knowledge and Space Efficient. The study evaluated responses based on criteria like consistency, informativeness, and fluency using a Likert-like scale. Our SURGE framework received significantly higher scores in all criteria, providing further evidence of its ability to generate consistent, informative, and fluent responses. <Graph-Text Embeddings>
Furthermore, we visualized the latent space of graph-text embeddings learned by our framework. The visualization demonstrates that SURGE with graph-text contrastive learning generates distinct response embeddings for different subgraphs, unlike the version without contrastive learning which shows less variety in responses for the same dialogue. <Conclusion>
In conclusion, our proposed SURGE framework effectively addresses the challenge of knowledge-grounded dialogue generation by retrieving context-relevant subgraphs, encoding them with text, and generating natural and informative responses based on the retrieved subgraph. Our experiments highlight the contributions of each component in retrieval, encoding, and graph-text representation learning. This work opens up new possibilities for generating informative responses in knowledge graph-based dialogue tasks by emphasizing the importance of retrieving relevant subgraph knowledge rather than relying on all available knowledge graphs.
- - Language models have made advancements in dialogue generation tasks, but struggle with generating responses that require factual knowledge.
- - Some methods leverage facts from Knowledge Graphs (KGs), but do not guarantee the utilization of relevant knowledge.
- - The SURGE framework proposes a solution for generating context-relevant and knowledge-grounded dialogues using KGs.
- - The framework consists of two main steps: subgraph retrieval and response generation.
- - Subgraph retrieval involves retrieving the relevant subgraph from the KG containing necessary factual knowledge.
- - Response generation enforces consistency across facts by perturbing their word embeddings conditioned on the retrieved subgraph.
- - Contrastive learning is employed to ensure generated responses are faithful to the retrieved subgraphs.
- - Experiments on OpendialKG and KOMODIS datasets validate the effectiveness of SURGE in generating high-quality responses reflecting knowledge from KGs.
- - A human study involving 46 annotators shows that SURGE outperforms other approaches in terms of consistency, informativeness, and fluency.
- - Visualization of graph-text embeddings demonstrates that SURGE generates distinct response embeddings for different subgraphs, emphasizing its effectiveness compared to versions without contrastive learning.
- - The proposed SURGE framework addresses the challenge of knowledge-grounded dialogue generation by retrieving context-relevant subgraphs, encoding them with text, and generating natural and informative responses based on the retrieved subgraph.
Summary- Language models have improved in generating conversations, but struggle with providing factual information.
- Some methods use Knowledge Graphs (KGs) to include facts, but they may not always use the right knowledge.
- The SURGE framework suggests a solution for creating relevant and knowledgeable dialogues using KGs.
- This framework has two main steps: finding the necessary facts from the KG and generating responses.
- Experiments and studies show that SURGE is effective in producing high-quality responses based on KG knowledge.
Definitions- Language models: Computer programs that generate text or speech based on patterns and data.
- Dialogue generation: Creating conversations between two or more entities, often done by computers or AI systems.
- Factual knowledge: Information that is true and can be proven with evidence.
- Knowledge Graphs (KGs): A way of organizing information by connecting related concepts through relationships.
- Context-relevant: Information that is appropriate and applicable to the current situation or topic being discussed.
- Subgraph retrieval: Finding a smaller section of a larger graph that contains specific information needed for a task.
- Response generation: Creating a reply or answer to a given question or statement.
- Consistency: Being in agreement or harmony with something else, such as ensuring all facts align with each other in generated responses.
- Informativeness: Providing useful and valuable information in generated responses.
- Fluency: The ability to speak or write smoothly and easily without pauses or errors.
Introduction
In recent years, language models have made significant advancements in dialogue generation tasks. However, when it comes to generating responses that require factual knowledge, these models still fall short due to a lack of mechanisms for retrieving, encoding, and reflecting knowledge in the generated responses. This limitation poses a challenge for generating informative and context-relevant dialogues.
To overcome this issue, researchers have attempted to leverage facts from Knowledge Graphs (KGs) – structured databases that store information about entities and their relationships – as a source of factual knowledge for dialogue generation. However, existing methods do not guarantee that the model will utilize relevant knowledge from the KGs.
To address this gap in current research, a team of researchers proposed a framework called SUbgraph Retrieval-augmented GEneration (SURGE) for generating context-relevant and knowledgeable dialogues using KGs. The SURGE framework aims to retrieve relevant subgraphs from KGs and use them to generate informed responses while ensuring consistency across facts.
The SURGE Framework
The SURGE framework consists of two main steps: subgraph retrieval and response generation.
Subgraph Retrieval
In the first step of the SURGE framework, relevant subgraphs are retrieved from the KG based on the input dialogue context. These subgraphs contain necessary factual knowledge related to the conversation topic.
This process involves identifying key entities mentioned in the dialogue context and using them as query terms to search through the KG. The retrieved subgraphs are then filtered based on relevance scores calculated using entity matching techniques such as TF-IDF or BM25.
Response Generation
Once relevant subgraphs are retrieved, they are used as input for response generation. In this step, consistency across facts is enforced by perturbing their word embeddings conditioned on the retrieved subgraph.
This means that words related to the retrieved subgraph are given higher weights during the generation process, resulting in responses that reflect the factual knowledge from KGs. To further ensure faithfulness to the retrieved subgraphs, contrastive learning is employed.
Evaluation and Results
To evaluate the effectiveness of SURGE in generating context-relevant and knowledgeable dialogues, experiments were conducted on two datasets – OpendialKG and KOMODIS. The results showed that our approach outperformed existing methods in terms of accuracy and informativeness.
In addition to quantitative evaluations, a human study was also conducted involving 46 annotators to assess the quality of generated responses compared to other approaches such as All Knowledge and Space Efficient. The study evaluated responses based on criteria like consistency, informativeness, and fluency using a Likert-like scale.
The results of this study showed that our SURGE framework received significantly higher scores in all criteria, providing further evidence of its ability to generate consistent, informative, and fluent responses.
Furthermore, visualization of the latent space of graph-text embeddings learned by our framework demonstrated that SURGE with graph-text contrastive learning generates distinct response embeddings for different subgraphs. This indicates that our approach can effectively capture relevant knowledge from KGs while generating diverse responses for different dialogue contexts.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the proposed SURGE framework effectively addresses the challenge of knowledge-grounded dialogue generation by retrieving context-relevant subgraphs from KGs and using them to generate natural and informative responses. Our experiments highlight the contributions of each component in retrieval, encoding, and graph-text representation learning.
This work opens up new possibilities for generating informative responses in knowledge graph-based dialogue tasks by emphasizing the importance of retrieving relevant subgraph knowledge rather than relying on all available information from KGs. Future research could explore ways to improve efficiency without compromising performance or investigate other techniques for incorporating factual knowledge into dialogue generation models.