JADES: Differing assembly histories of galaxies -- Observational evidence for bursty SFHs and (mini-)quenching in the first billion years of the Universe
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- A recent study used deep NIRSpec spectroscopic data from the JADES survey to investigate the star formation histories (SFHs) of 200 galaxies at redshifts ranging from 0.6 to 11 and spanning stellar masses from $\rm 10^6$ to $\rm 10^{9.5}~M_\odot$
- High-redshift galaxies, those above the Main Sequence (MS), and low-mass galaxies tend to host younger stellar populations than their low-redshift, massive, and below-MS counterparts
- The correlation between age, M$_*$ and SFR existed even earlier than Cosmic Noon, out to the earliest cosmic epochs
- High-redshift and low-mass galaxies have particularly bursty SFHs while more massive and lower-redshift systems evolve more steadily
- Evidence for another (mini-)quenched galaxy at z = 4.4 in addition to one reported by Looser et al. in 2023 at z=7.3 was presented
- There was a steady decline of dust reddening of the stellar population approaching the earliest cosmic epochs; however, some dust reddening is still observed in some of the highest redshift and most star-forming systems
- This study provides observational evidence for differing assembly histories of galaxies with bursty SFHs and (mini-)quenching occurring in the first billion years of the Universe
- The findings highlight the importance of considering burstiness when studying galaxy evolution and formation as it can lead to temporary quiescence or extended periods of star formation activity depending on environmental conditions such as mass or redshift
Authors: Tobias J. Looser, Francesco D'Eugenio, Roberto Maiolino, Sandro Tacchella, Mirko Curti, Santiago Arribas, William M. Baker, Stefi Baum, Nina Bonaventura, Kristan Boyett, Andrew J. Bunker, Stefano Carniani, Stephane Charlot, Jacopo Chevallard, Emma Curtis-Lake, A. Lola Danhaive, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Anna de Graaff, Kevin Hainline, Zhiyuan Ji, Benjamin D. Johnson, Nimisha Kumari, Erica Nelson, Eleonora Parlanti, Hans-Walter Rix, Brant Robertson, Bruno Rodríguez Del Pino, Lester Sandles, Jan Scholtz, Renske Smit, Daniel P. Stark, Hannah Übler, Christina C. Williams, Chris Willott, Joris Witstok
Abstract: We use deep NIRSpec spectroscopic data from the JADES survey to derive the star formation histories (SFHs) of a sample of 200 galaxies at 0.6$<$z$<$11 and spanning stellar masses from $\rm 10^6$ to $\rm 10^{9.5}~M_\odot$. We find that galaxies at high-redshift, galaxies above the Main Sequence (MS) and low-mass galaxies tend to host younger stellar populations than their low-redshift, massive, and below the MS counterparts. Interestingly, the correlation between age, M$_*$ and SFR existed even earlier than Cosmic Noon, out to the earliest cosmic epochs. However, these trends have a large scatter. Indeed, there are examples of young stellar populations also below the MS, indicating recent (bursty) star formation in evolved systems. We explore further the burstiness of the SFHs by using the ratio between SFR averaged over the last 10 Myr and averaged between 10 Myr and 100 Myr before the epoch of observation ($\mathrm{SFR_{cont, 10}/SFR_{cont, 90}}$). We find that high-redshift and low-mass galaxies have particularly bursty SFHs, while more massive and lower-redshift systems evolve more steadily. We also present the discovery of another (mini-)quenched galaxy at z = 4.4 (in addition to the one at z=7.3 reported by Looser et al. 2023), which might be only temporarily quiescent as a consequence of the extremely bursty evolution. Finally, we also find a steady decline of dust reddening of the stellar population approaching the earliest cosmic epochs, although some dust reddening is still observed in some of the highest redshift and most star forming systems.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.