Glitch systematics on the observation of massive black-hole binaries with LISA

AI-generated keywords: LISA

AI-generated Key Points

  • LISA faces a significant data-analysis challenge in detecting and characterizing thousands of gravitational-wave signals
  • Researchers introduced a novel approach for jointly reconstructing short-lived astrophysical signals and noise artifacts inspired by glitches observed during the LISA Pathfinder mission
  • Utilizing full Bayesian inference techniques with LISA time-delay interferometric data and gravitational waveforms describing mergers of massive black holes
  • The study focuses on a specific binary system with a detector-frame total mass of $6 \times 10^7 M_\odot$ at redshift 5, producing a signal lasting approximately 30 hours within the LISA sensitivity band
  • Two different glitch models were explored – a fixed parametric family and a shapelet decomposition – to address varying levels of flexibility in modeling transient artifacts
  • Ignoring glitches can lead to a complete loss of the gravitational-wave signal, while even modest glitches can introduce biases in estimating parameters related to black-hole properties
  • Employing a joint inference approach effectively cleanses the reconstruction process, ensuring accurate representation of both astrophysical signals and glitch artifacts
  • Researchers demonstrate their ability to correctly identify different transient models by injecting various glitch morphologies in isolation without superimposed gravitational signals
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Alice Spadaro, Riccardo Buscicchio, Daniele Vetrugno, Antoine Klein, Davide Gerosa, Stefano Vitale, Rita Dolesi, William Joseph Weber, Monica Colpi

Phys. Rev. D 108, 123029 (2023)
17 pages, 9 figures, 7 tables (accepted to Physical Review D on 22 September 2023)
License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract: Detecting and coherently characterizing thousands of gravitational-wave signals is a core data-analysis challenge for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). Transient artifacts, or "glitches", with disparate morphologies are expected to be present in the data, potentially affecting the scientific return of the mission. We present the first joint reconstruction of short-lived astrophysical signals and noise artifacts. Our analysis is inspired by glitches observed by the LISA Pathfinder mission, including both acceleration and fast displacement transients. We perform full Bayesian inference using LISA time-delay interferometric data and gravitational waveforms describing mergers of massive black holes. We focus on a representative binary with a detector-frame total mass of $6 \times 10^7 M_\odot$ at redshift $5$, yielding a signal lasting $\sim 30~\mathrm{h}$ in the LISA sensitivity band. We explore two glitch models of different flexibility, namely a fixed parametric family and a shapelet decomposition. In the most challenging scenario, we report a complete loss of the gravitational-wave signal if the glitch is ignored; more modest glitches induce biases on the black-hole parameters. On the other hand, a joint inference approach fully sanitizes the reconstruction of both the astrophysical and the glitch signal. We also inject a variety of glitch morphologies in isolation, without a superimposed gravitational signal, and show we can identify the correct transient model. Our analysis is an important stepping stone toward a realistic treatment of LISA data in the context of the highly sought-after "global fit".

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Jun. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.03923v2

The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) faces a significant data-analysis challenge in detecting and characterizing thousands of gravitational-wave signals. These signals can potentially be impacted by transient artifacts, known as "glitches", with diverse morphologies in the data. In a groundbreaking study, researchers have introduced a novel approach for jointly reconstructing short-lived astrophysical signals and noise artifacts inspired by glitches observed during the LISA Pathfinder mission. Utilizing full Bayesian inference techniques with LISA time-delay interferometric data and gravitational waveforms describing mergers of massive black holes, the study focuses on a specific binary system with a detector-frame total mass of $6 \times 10^7 M_\odot$ at redshift 5. This binary system produces a signal lasting approximately 30 hours within the LISA sensitivity band. The analysis explores two different glitch models – a fixed parametric family and a shapelet decomposition – to address varying levels of flexibility in modeling these transient artifacts. The most challenging scenario highlighted in this research reveals that ignoring glitches can lead to a complete loss of the gravitational-wave signal. Even more modest glitches can introduce biases in estimating parameters related to black-hole properties. However, employing a joint inference approach effectively cleanses the reconstruction process, ensuring accurate representation of both astrophysical signals and glitch artifacts. Furthermore, by injecting various glitch morphologies in isolation without superimposed gravitational signals, researchers demonstrate their ability to correctly identify different transient models. This comprehensive analysis serves as an essential stepping stone towards developing realistic strategies for handling LISA data within the context of achieving a highly sought-after "global fit". Authored by Alice Spadaro, Riccardo Buscicchio, Daniele Vetrugno, Antoine Klein, Davide Gerosa, Stefano Vitale, Rita Dolesi, William Joseph Weber, and Monica Colpi; this research has been published in Physical Review D (108:123029) with DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123029.
Created on 21 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.