Observing gravitational waves with solar system astrometry

AI-generated keywords: Gravitational Waves Astrometric Signal Solar System Objects Pulsar Timing Arrays Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background

AI-generated Key Points

  • Investigating the influence of gravitational waves on celestial body positioning
  • Exploring observational opportunities provided by this phenomenon
  • Focusing on astrometric signal induced by isotropic Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background (SGWB)
  • Analyzing proper motion of Solar System objects using Pulsar Timing Arrays (PTA)
  • Deriving distinctive dipole and quadrupole correlations from SGWB
  • Mentioning cases where these correlations may not be present
  • Including both Einsteinian and non-Einsteinian polarizations in analysis
  • Proposing tracking proper motions of solar system objects to estimate upper limits for SGWB amplitude
  • Highlighting potential contributions from upcoming missions like Gaia satellite and Vera C. Rubin Observatory
  • Referencing related studies by Mignard and Klioner, Qin et al., Golat and Contaldi, Mentasti et al., Book and Flanagan, Darling et al., Gaia Collaboration et al., Hellings and Downs, and Tanga et al.
  • Providing additional context on astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, gravitational wave detection, astrophysical observations, and the Gaia mission
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Giorgio Mentasti, Carlo R. Contaldi

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The subtle influence of gravitational waves on the apparent positioning of celestial bodies offers novel observational windows. We calculate the expected astrometric signal induced by an isotropic Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background (SGWB) in the short distance limit. Our focus is on the resultant proper motion of Solar System objects, a signal on the same time scales addressed by Pulsar Timing Arrays (PTA). We derive the corresponding astrometric deflection patterns, finding that they manifest as distinctive dipole and quadrupole correlations, or in some cases, may not be present. Our analysis encompasses both Einsteinian and non-Einsteinian polarisations. We estimate the upper limits for the amplitude of a scale-invariant SGWB that could be obtained by tracking the proper motions of large numbers of solar system objects such as asteroids. With the Gaia satellite and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory poised to track an extensive sample of asteroids-ranging from $O(10^5)$ to $O(10^6)$, we highlight the significant future potential for similar surveys to contribute to our understanding of the SGWB.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Nov. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2311.03474v1

In this study, the authors investigate the subtle influence of gravitational waves on the apparent positioning of celestial bodies and explore how this phenomenon can provide new observational opportunities. Specifically, they focus on the astrometric signal induced by an isotropic Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background (SGWB) in the short distance limit. The analysis centers around the proper motion of Solar System objects, which is a signal that can be addressed by Pulsar Timing Arrays (PTA). The authors derive astrometric deflection patterns resulting from the SGWB and find that they manifest as distinctive dipole and quadrupole correlations. However, in some cases, these correlations may not be present. The analysis encompasses both Einsteinian and non-Einsteinian polarizations, providing a comprehensive understanding of the effects of gravitational waves. To estimate the upper limits for the amplitude of a scale-invariant SGWB, the authors propose tracking the proper motions of large numbers of solar system objects such as asteroids. With upcoming missions like Gaia satellite and Vera C. Rubin Observatory poised to track extensive samples of asteroids ranging from $O(10^5)$ to $O(10^6)$, there is significant potential for similar surveys to contribute to our understanding of the SGWB. The authors also provide additional context by referencing related studies in their summary. They mention previous work by Mignard and Klioner (2012) [19], Qin et al. (2019) [20], Golat and Contaldi (2021) [21], and Mentasti et al. (2023) [22]. These references highlight relevant research on topics such as astronomy and astrophysics, cosmology, and gravitational wave observations. Furthermore, they cite studies by Book and Flanagan (2011) [10], Darling et al. (2018) [11], Gaia Collaboration et al. (2023) [12], Hellings and Downs (1983) [13], and Tanga et al. (2021) [14]. These references provide additional background information on subjects like gravitational wave detection, astrophysical observations, and the Gaia mission. Overall, this refined summary emphasizes the authors' investigation into the astrometric signal induced by an isotropic Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background in order to estimate its upper limits for amplitude through tracking proper motions of solar system objects such as asteroids with upcoming missions like Gaia satellite or Vera C Rubin Observatory with potential samples ranging from $O(10^5)-O(10^6)$. Additionally it highlights related studies in astronomy/astrophysics/cosmology/gravitational wave observations providing further context for understanding this phenomenon better while citing relevant sources for further reference purposes .
Created on 16 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.